Wearable Devices Ltd.
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $1.85 | +2.78% | 1.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $272.14 | +0.00% | 4T | 34.67 | $7.91 | +0.38% |
| SONY | $21.60 | +0.02% | 127.9B | 16.11 | $1.33 | +0.49% |
| NXT | $120.58 | +0.00% | 17.3B | 29.72 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $5.12 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 33.41 | $0.16 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $14.80 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -96.25 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ZEPP | $24.18 | +0.00% | 336.9M | -5.88 | -$4.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while AAPL trades at $272.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AAPL's competition here
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while SONY trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONY's competition here
WLDSW vs NXT Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while NXT trades at $120.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check NXT's competition here
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while LPL trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check LPL's competition here
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWSN's competition here
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VZIO's competition here
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while SONO trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -96.25. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONO's competition here
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check HEAR's competition here
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 336.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while ZEPP trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check ZEPP's competition here
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while VUZI trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VUZI's competition here
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while TBCH trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check TBCH's competition here
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while GPRO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check GPRO's competition here
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while BWNB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWNB's competition here
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while KOSS trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -46.44. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check KOSS's competition here
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while FEBO trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FEBO's competition here
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check PXDT's competition here
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while MSN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MSN's competition here
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MICS's competition here
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UTME's competition here
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while RIME trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check RIME's competition here
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while WTO trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WTO's competition here
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 755.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while WLDS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WLDS's competition here
WLDSW vs BOXL Comparison February 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 727.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.85, while BOXL trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -1.92%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BOXL's competition here