Wearable Devices Ltd.
Wearable Devices Ltd. WLDSW Peers
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $1.23 | +17.14% | 1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $212.41 | +0.60% | 3.2T | 29.95 | $7.09 | +0.47% |
| SONY | $24.65 | -2.07% | 148.4B | 18.81 | $1.31 | +0.49% |
| FIS | $80.22 | +0.25% | 42.1B | 51.08 | $1.57 | +2.35% |
| LPL | $3.43 | -0.29% | 3.4B | -2.40 | -$1.43 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $11.09 | +1.84% | 1.3B | -19.80 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $13.96 | -0.43% | 281.4M | 18.88 | $0.74 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.51 | -2.71% | 191.4M | -2.44 | -$1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while AAPL trades at $212.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while SONY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs FIS Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while FIS trades at $80.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 51.08. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while LPL trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VZIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while SONO trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while TBCH trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while VUZI trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VOXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while GPRO trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while BWNB trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while BWSN trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs UEIC Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while UEIC trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while KOSS trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -68.81. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs AXIL Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while AXIL trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs FOXX Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while FOXX trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while ZEPP trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while FEBO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and PXDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while MSN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while RIME trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while WTO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.23, while WLDS trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.