Wearable Devices Ltd.
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $12.60 | +0.00% | 808.3K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $248.96 | -0.39% | 3.7T | 31.47 | $7.91 | +0.42% |
| SONY | $20.62 | +1.18% | 123.1B | 15.98 | $1.29 | +0.51% |
| NXT | $118.74 | +2.91% | 17.6B | 30.29 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.07 | +1.12% | 4.1B | 27.13 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $13.43 | +0.75% | 1.6B | -83.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $11.23 | -1.06% | 222.4M | 12.62 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while AAPL trades at $248.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AAPL's competition here
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while SONY trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONY's competition here
WLDSW vs NXT Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while NXT trades at $118.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check NXT's competition here
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while LPL trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check LPL's competition here
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWSN's competition here
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VZIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VZIO's competition here
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while SONO trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -83.94. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONO's competition here
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check HEAR's competition here
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while TBCH trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check TBCH's competition here
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while ZEPP trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check ZEPP's competition here
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VUZI trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VUZI's competition here
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VOXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while GPRO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check GPRO's competition here
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BWNB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWNB's competition here
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while KOSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -43.56. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check KOSS's competition here
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while FEBO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and FEBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FEBO's competition here
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and PXDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXDT's competition here
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while MSN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MSN's competition here
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MICS's competition here
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UTME's competition here
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while RIME trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check RIME's competition here
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while WTO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WTO's competition here
WLDSW vs BOXL Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BOXL trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BOXL's competition here
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison March 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 808.3K. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 420.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while WLDS trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WLDS's competition here