Wearable Devices Ltd.
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $1.75 | -1.69% | 1.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $213.25 | -7.02% | 3.4T | 31.29 | $7.26 | +0.45% |
| SONY | $24.92 | -8.21% | 163.7B | 20.50 | $1.33 | +0.44% |
| FIS | $69.90 | -1.77% | 36.5B | 279.68 | $0.25 | +2.16% |
| LPL | $4.05 | -0.74% | 4.1B | -2.86 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $11.04 | -2.56% | 1.4B | -18.23 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $14.45 | -7.84% | 311.6M | 21.26 | $0.74 | N/A |
| GPRO | $1.31 | -7.09% | 209.8M | -1.49 | -$0.88 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while AAPL trades at $213.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AAPL's competition here
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 163.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while SONY trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONY's competition here
WLDSW vs FIS Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while FIS trades at $69.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 279.68. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FIS's competition here
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while LPL trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check LPL's competition here
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VZIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VZIO's competition here
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while SONO trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONO's competition here
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check HEAR's competition here
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while TBCH trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check TBCH's competition here
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while GPRO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check GPRO's competition here
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while VUZI trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VUZI's competition here
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 130.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while BWSN trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWSN's competition here
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while BWNB trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWNB's competition here
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while ZEPP trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check ZEPP's competition here
WLDSW vs UEIC Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while UEIC trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UEIC's competition here
WLDSW vs AXIL Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while AXIL trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AXIL's competition here
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while KOSS trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -66.62. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check KOSS's competition here
WLDSW vs FOXX Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while FOXX trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while MSN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MSN's competition here
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check PXDT's competition here
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while FEBO trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FEBO's competition here
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MICS's competition here
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UTME's competition here
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while RIME trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check RIME's competition here
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while WTO trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WTO's competition here
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison August 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.75, while WLDS trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WLDS's competition here