Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | $204.39 | +0.29% | 28.5B | 31.01 | $6.59 | +0.90% |
| EFX | $183.79 | -1.88% | 22.5B | 34.56 | $5.32 | +1.11% |
| TRU | $73.05 | -0.83% | 14.2B | 31.48 | $2.32 | +0.64% |
| BAH | $78.66 | +2.00% | 9.7B | 11.68 | $6.74 | +2.83% |
| FCN | $164.99 | +0.96% | 5.1B | 20.03 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $64.50 | -1.26% | 3.2B | 31.46 | $2.05 | +1.86% |
| HURN | $125.48 | -1.10% | 2.2B | 21.49 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $66.43 | -1.79% | 1.2B | 13.42 | $4.95 | +0.84% |
| CRAI | $154.44 | -0.79% | 1B | 18.97 | $8.14 | +1.37% |
| SBC | $3.50 | -3.85% | 359M | 8.33 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VRSK vs EFX Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while EFX trades at $183.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EFX's competition here
VRSK vs TRU Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while TRU trades at $73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TRU's competition here
VRSK vs BAH Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while BAH trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check BAH's competition here
VRSK vs FCN Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while FCN trades at $164.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FCN's competition here
VRSK vs EXPO Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while EXPO trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EXPO's competition here
VRSK vs HURN Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while HURN trades at $125.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check HURN's competition here
VRSK vs ICFI Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while ICFI trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ICFI's competition here
VRSK vs CRAI Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while CRAI trades at $154.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CRAI's competition here
VRSK vs SBC Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while SBC trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SBC's competition here
VRSK vs ROMA Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while ROMA trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -45.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ROMA's competition here
VRSK vs EGG Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while EGG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EGG's competition here
VRSK vs FC Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while FC trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -97.25. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FC's competition here
VRSK vs RGP Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while RGP trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RGP's competition here
VRSK vs FORR Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while FORR trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FORR's competition here
VRSK vs SDH Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SDH's competition here
VRSK vs SBCWW Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SBCWW's competition here
VRSK vs RYOJ Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while RYOJ trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RYOJ's competition here
VRSK vs EPOW Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while EPOW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EPOW's competition here
VRSK vs GRNQ Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while GRNQ trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check GRNQ's competition here
VRSK vs AERT Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while AERT trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AERT's competition here
VRSK vs AERTW Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 838.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AERTW's competition here
VRSK vs INTJ Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 221.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while INTJ trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check INTJ's competition here
VRSK vs VCIG Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 197.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while VCIG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check VCIG's competition here
VRSK vs FGO Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VRSK has daily volatility of 3.55 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
VRSK vs NLSN Comparison March 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 28.5B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $204.39, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 31.01, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check NLSN's competition here