Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. VRSK Peers
See (VRSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | $301.21 | -3.75% | 42.1B | 44.36 | $6.79 | +0.55% |
| EFX | $262.37 | -0.59% | 32.6B | 53.41 | $4.91 | +0.64% |
| TRU | $90.16 | +0.29% | 17.6B | 48.23 | $1.87 | +0.49% |
| BAH | $108.27 | +0.89% | 13.4B | 14.93 | $7.25 | +1.95% |
| FCN | $163.86 | -0.25% | 5.6B | 22.39 | $7.32 | N/A |
| EXPO | $77.60 | +1.36% | 3.9B | 38.02 | $2.04 | +1.49% |
| HURN | $138.39 | +0.81% | 2.4B | 20.84 | $6.65 | N/A |
| ICFI | $88.26 | +1.26% | 1.6B | 15.18 | $5.82 | +0.63% |
| CRAI | $195.45 | +1.82% | 1.3B | 26.35 | $7.41 | +0.97% |
| SBC | $4.47 | -4.08% | 462.1M | 9.29 | $0.48 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VRSK vs EFX Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while EFX trades at $262.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs TRU Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while TRU trades at $90.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs BAH Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while BAH trades at $108.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs FCN Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while FCN trades at $163.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs EXPO Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while EXPO trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs HURN Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while HURN trades at $138.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs ICFI Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while ICFI trades at $88.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs CRAI Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while CRAI trades at $195.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs SBC Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while SBC trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs FC Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while FC trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs RGP Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 196.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while RGP trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs FORR Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while FORR trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs AERTW Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while AERTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs AERT Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while AERT trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs SDH Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs ROMA Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while ROMA trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs EPOW Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while EPOW trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs SBCWW Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while SBCWW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs GRNQ Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while GRNQ trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs INTJ Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while INTJ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs VCIG Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while VCIG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.
VRSK vs NLSN Comparison
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 42.1B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $301.21, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 44.36, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +4.07%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.