Verisk Analytics, Inc.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 46.62B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EXPGY trades at $51.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 46.26B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EXPGF trades at $50.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 33.51B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EFX trades at $269.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 55.07. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SGSOF trades at $107.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SGSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 19.13B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SGSOY trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 16.80B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while TRU trades at $86.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 46.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 15.69B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BAH trades at $123.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BVVBY trades at $64.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BVRDF trades at $30.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to BVRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while FCN trades at $164.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BYCRF trades at $34.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while CPBLF trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 953.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while DKSHF trades at $66.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DKSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EXPO trades at $76.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while HURN trades at $150.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while IPSOF trades at $50.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ICFI trades at $86.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while CRAI trades at $187.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 607.32M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EUBG trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 432.98M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SBC trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 274.17M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while FC trades at $21.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 191.71M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while FORR trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 180.23M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while RGP trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 126.31M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AYAG trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to AYAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 58.56M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while KMNCF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to KMNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 52.98M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 49.17M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while FLCX trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to FLCX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 40.14M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while MANOF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 28.02M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AERT trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ROMA trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 23.61M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while EPOW trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +439.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 19.69M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SBCWW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 16.27M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while VCIG trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while INTJ trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while GRNQ trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 5.52M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while GPLS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 2.96M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while VIZC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AIMH trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while INTO trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to INTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to INTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while DFCO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to DFCO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ADHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 798604.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AERTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 692623.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while QPRC trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 551107.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while MRDH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to MRDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 538559.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while BLDV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 449602.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AERS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 285526.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SGDH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 280980.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while FUGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to FUGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 278535.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while DEQI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DEQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 248402.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while GTVH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to GTVH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 204381.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of +15.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to AMMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174120.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while DCAC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to DCAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to DCAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140422.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while LGBS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to LGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101926.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87511.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while MSYN trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 75149.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while CSLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CSLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72012.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ITEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ITEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 56998.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ENCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 35158.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while PCHK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to PCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 8862.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while STWC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to STWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while HDST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to HDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, NLSN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, GLSEF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to GLSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, RPSGF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to RPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.

VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 43.29B. In comparison, ISAT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $309.50, while ISAT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 46.47, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.45%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to ISAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.