Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLSN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLSN | $27.98 | +0.04% | 0 | 17.71 | $1.58 | +0.86% |
| EFX | $172.07 | +6.10% | 20.8B | 21.54 | $7.99 | +1.23% |
| IT | $136.32 | +1.91% | 9.1B | 10.06 | $13.55 | N/A |
| BAH | $62.45 | +4.07% | 7.5B | 9.58 | $6.52 | +3.65% |
| FCN | $153.59 | +2.81% | 4.6B | 18.26 | $8.41 | N/A |
| EXPO | $60.98 | +1.74% | 3B | 28.36 | $2.15 | +2.00% |
| HURN | $97.16 | +0.81% | 1.6B | 12.31 | $7.89 | N/A |
| ICFI | $74.99 | +3.51% | 1.4B | 11.90 | $6.30 | +0.75% |
| CRAI | $146.79 | +0.58% | 948.7M | 18.37 | $7.99 | +1.50% |
| ONT | $20.92 | +1.45% | 756M | 149.43 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NLSN vs EFX Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EFX trades at $172.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EFX's competition here
NLSN vs IT Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while IT trades at $136.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check IT's competition here
NLSN vs BAH Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while BAH trades at $62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check BAH's competition here
NLSN vs FCN Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FCN trades at $153.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FCN's competition here
NLSN vs EXPO Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EXPO trades at $60.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EXPO's competition here
NLSN vs HURN Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while HURN trades at $97.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check HURN's competition here
NLSN vs ICFI Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ICFI trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ICFI's competition here
NLSN vs CRAI Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 948.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while CRAI trades at $146.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check CRAI's competition here
NLSN vs ONT Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ONT trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is 149.43. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ONT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ONT's competition here
NLSN vs ROMA Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ROMA trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -67.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ROMA's competition here
NLSN vs SBC Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBC trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBC's competition here
NLSN vs FC Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FC trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FC's competition here
NLSN vs EGG Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EGG trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 332.50. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EGG's competition here
NLSN vs FORR Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FORR trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FORR's competition here
NLSN vs SDH Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SDH's competition here
NLSN vs AERT Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERT trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -367.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERT's competition here
NLSN vs RYOJ Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RYOJ trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 265.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RYOJ's competition here
NLSN vs AERTW Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERTW's competition here
NLSN vs SBCWW Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBCWW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBCWW's competition here
NLSN vs EPOW Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EPOW trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EPOW's competition here
NLSN vs GRNQ Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while GRNQ trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check GRNQ's competition here
NLSN vs VCIG Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 253K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VCIG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VCIG's competition here
NLSN vs FGO Comparison July 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NLSN has daily volatility of 0.11 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here