Nielsen Holdings plc
Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLSN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLSN | $27.98 | +0.04% | 0 | 17.71 | $1.58 | +0.86% |
| EFX | $160.83 | -2.07% | 19.4B | 28.27 | $5.69 | +1.28% |
| TRU | $66.08 | -3.67% | 12.7B | 18.31 | $3.61 | +0.71% |
| IT | $154.14 | -0.83% | 10.3B | 15.23 | $10.12 | N/A |
| BAH | $77.00 | +2.79% | 9.3B | 11.42 | $6.74 | +2.91% |
| FCN | $154.64 | +0.60% | 4.7B | 18.42 | $8.40 | N/A |
| EXPO | $56.99 | -0.63% | 2.8B | 26.63 | $2.14 | +2.12% |
| HURN | $108.04 | -0.08% | 1.8B | 18.47 | $5.85 | N/A |
| ICFI | $66.56 | +3.15% | 1.2B | 14.38 | $4.63 | +0.85% |
| CRAI | $144.99 | +0.06% | 937.1M | 20.14 | $7.20 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
NLSN vs EFX Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EFX trades at $160.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EFX's competition here
NLSN vs TRU Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while TRU trades at $66.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check TRU's competition here
NLSN vs IT Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while IT trades at $154.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check IT's competition here
NLSN vs BAH Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while BAH trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check BAH's competition here
NLSN vs FCN Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FCN trades at $154.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FCN's competition here
NLSN vs EXPO Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EXPO trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EXPO's competition here
NLSN vs HURN Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while HURN trades at $108.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check HURN's competition here
NLSN vs ICFI Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ICFI trades at $66.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ICFI's competition here
NLSN vs CRAI Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 937.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while CRAI trades at $144.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check CRAI's competition here
NLSN vs ROMA Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ROMA trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -68.17. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ROMA's competition here
NLSN vs SBC Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 296.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBC trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBC's competition here
NLSN vs EGG Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EGG trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 475.50. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EGG's competition here
NLSN vs FC Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FC trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -97.05. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FC's competition here
NLSN vs RGP Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RGP trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RGP's competition here
NLSN vs FORR Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FORR trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FORR's competition here
NLSN vs SDH Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SDH's competition here
NLSN vs AERT Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERT's competition here
NLSN vs RYOJ Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RYOJ trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RYOJ's competition here
NLSN vs EPOW Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EPOW trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EPOW's competition here
NLSN vs SBCWW Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBCWW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBCWW's competition here
NLSN vs GRNQ Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while GRNQ trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check GRNQ's competition here
NLSN vs AERTW Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 969.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERTW's competition here
NLSN vs INTJ Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 302.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while INTJ trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check INTJ's competition here
NLSN vs VCIG Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 81.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VCIG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VCIG's competition here
NLSN vs FGO Comparison May 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NLSN has daily volatility of 0.11 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here