Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while EFX trades at $192.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EFX's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while IT trades at $193.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check IT's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while BAH trades at $76.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check BAH's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while FCN trades at $153.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FCN's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while HURN trades at $162.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check HURN's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while ICFI trades at $89.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ICFI's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while CRAI trades at $174.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check CRAI's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 504.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while ROMA trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -70.62. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ROMA's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while SBC trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBC's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while PPHC trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check PPHC's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while FORR trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FORR's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while FC trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FC's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while RGP trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RGP's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while EGG trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EGG's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while RYOJ trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 471.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RYOJ's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SDH's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ACCL has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while ACCL trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ACCL's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ACCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ACCL's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while AERT trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERT's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while SBCWW trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBCWW's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while GRNQ trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -50.70. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check GRNQ's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FOFO has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while FOFO trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FOFO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FOFO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FOFO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FOFO's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while EPOW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EPOW's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while ZTG trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ZTG's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while VCIG trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VCIG's competition here

Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98 on the NYSE, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is not fully comparable compared to FGO. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FGO's competition here