Huron Consulting Group Inc.

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while VRSK trades at $187.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VRSK's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while EFX trades at $172.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN and EFX have similar daily volatility (1.53).Check EFX's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while TRU trades at $70.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check TRU's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while BAH trades at $76.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check BAH's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while FCN trades at $182.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FCN's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while EXPO trades at $66.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EXPO's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while ICFI trades at $68.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ICFI's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while CRAI trades at $154.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check CRAI's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while ROMA trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -52.42. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ROMA's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while SBC trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBC's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while FC trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -101.23. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FC's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while EGG trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 349.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EGG's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while RGP trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RGP's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while FORR trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FORR's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SDH's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while AERT trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERT's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while RYOJ trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RYOJ's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while SBCWW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBCWW's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while EPOW trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EPOW's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while GRNQ trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check GRNQ's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 989.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while AERTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERTW's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 316.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while INTJ trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check INTJ's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 109.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while VCIG trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VCIG's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HURN has daily volatility of 1.53 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here

HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $128.10, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.16, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check NLSN's competition here