Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROMA | $6.36 | +4.09% | 384.2M | -53.75 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VRSK | $176.41 | -0.66% | 22.9B | 26.91 | $6.50 | +1.05% |
| EFX | $171.59 | -0.51% | 20.6B | 29.98 | $5.69 | +1.21% |
| TRU | $70.16 | -3.37% | 13.7B | 30.67 | $2.32 | +0.66% |
| BAH | $76.00 | -3.48% | 9.2B | 11.30 | $6.74 | +2.93% |
| FCN | $187.82 | +1.95% | 5.7B | 22.45 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $67.57 | +2.57% | 3.3B | 31.97 | $2.07 | +1.82% |
| HURN | $130.03 | +2.78% | 2.1B | 21.77 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $65.99 | -2.20% | 1.2B | 13.37 | $4.95 | +0.84% |
| CRAI | $156.67 | +4.02% | 994.4M | 18.61 | $8.14 | +1.40% |
Stock Comparison
ROMA vs VRSK Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while VRSK trades at $176.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VRSK's competition here
ROMA vs EFX Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while EFX trades at $171.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EFX's competition here
ROMA vs TRU Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while TRU trades at $70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check TRU's competition here
ROMA vs BAH Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while BAH trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check BAH's competition here
ROMA vs FCN Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while FCN trades at $187.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FCN's competition here
ROMA vs EXPO Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while EXPO trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EXPO's competition here
ROMA vs HURN Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while HURN trades at $130.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check HURN's competition here
ROMA vs ICFI Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while ICFI trades at $65.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check ICFI's competition here
ROMA vs CRAI Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 994.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while CRAI trades at $156.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check CRAI's competition here
ROMA vs SBC Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while SBC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBC's competition here
ROMA vs FC Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while FC trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FC's competition here
ROMA vs EGG Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while EGG trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 359.50. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EGG's competition here
ROMA vs RGP Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while RGP trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RGP's competition here
ROMA vs FORR Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while FORR trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FORR's competition here
ROMA vs SDH Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SDH's competition here
ROMA vs AERT Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while AERT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERT's competition here
ROMA vs RYOJ Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while RYOJ trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 217.00. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RYOJ's competition here
ROMA vs GRNQ Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while GRNQ trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check GRNQ's competition here
ROMA vs EPOW Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while EPOW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EPOW's competition here
ROMA vs SBCWW Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while SBCWW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBCWW's competition here
ROMA vs AERTW Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERTW's competition here
ROMA vs INTJ Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 327.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while INTJ trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check INTJ's competition here
ROMA vs VCIG Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 107.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while VCIG trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VCIG's competition here
ROMA vs FGO Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ROMA has daily volatility of 0.95 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
ROMA vs NLSN Comparison April 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 384.2M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $6.36, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -53.75, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check NLSN's competition here