Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | $187.53 | +7.22% | 23.1B | 27.30 | $6.47 | +1.05% |
| EFX | $172.51 | +1.13% | 20.7B | 30.18 | $5.69 | +1.19% |
| TRU | $70.63 | -0.79% | 13.5B | 30.22 | $2.32 | +0.67% |
| BAH | $76.65 | +0.61% | 9.2B | 11.31 | $6.74 | +2.94% |
| FCN | $182.68 | -1.25% | 5.6B | 22.18 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $66.29 | +0.17% | 3.3B | 32.34 | $2.07 | +1.81% |
| HURN | $128.10 | +0.77% | 2.1B | 22.16 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $68.85 | +3.96% | 1.2B | 13.63 | $4.95 | +0.83% |
| CRAI | $154.40 | +1.94% | 1B | 19.01 | $8.14 | +1.37% |
| ROMA | $6.59 | +2.13% | 374.7M | -52.42 | -$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VRSK vs EFX Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while EFX trades at $172.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EFX's competition here
VRSK vs TRU Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while TRU trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TRU's competition here
VRSK vs BAH Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while BAH trades at $76.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check BAH's competition here
VRSK vs FCN Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while FCN trades at $182.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FCN's competition here
VRSK vs EXPO Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while EXPO trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EXPO's competition here
VRSK vs HURN Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while HURN trades at $128.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check HURN's competition here
VRSK vs ICFI Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while ICFI trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ICFI's competition here
VRSK vs CRAI Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while CRAI trades at $154.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CRAI's competition here
VRSK vs ROMA Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while ROMA trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -52.42. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ROMA's competition here
VRSK vs SBC Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while SBC trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SBC's competition here
VRSK vs FC Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while FC trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -101.23. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FC's competition here
VRSK vs EGG Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while EGG trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 349.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EGG's competition here
VRSK vs RGP Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while RGP trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RGP's competition here
VRSK vs FORR Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while FORR trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FORR's competition here
VRSK vs SDH Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SDH's competition here
VRSK vs AERT Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while AERT trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AERT's competition here
VRSK vs RYOJ Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while RYOJ trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RYOJ's competition here
VRSK vs SBCWW Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while SBCWW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SBCWW's competition here
VRSK vs EPOW Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while EPOW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check EPOW's competition here
VRSK vs GRNQ Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while GRNQ trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check GRNQ's competition here
VRSK vs AERTW Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 989.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AERTW's competition here
VRSK vs INTJ Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 316.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while INTJ trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check INTJ's competition here
VRSK vs VCIG Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 109.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while VCIG trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check VCIG's competition here
VRSK vs FGO Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VRSK has daily volatility of 5.83 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
VRSK vs NLSN Comparison April 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 23.1B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $187.53, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.30, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is +3.24%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check NLSN's competition here