Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | $188.35 | +2.52% | 24.7B | 26.02 | $7.24 | +1.01% |
| CART | $45.78 | +2.12% | 10.8B | 22.66 | $2.02 | N/A |
| NTSK | $11.71 | +0.43% | 4.7B | -12.73 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| KEEL | $4.59 | -14.68% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KC | $9.10 | -0.87% | 2.7B | -31.38 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| TRVG | $5.41 | -0.18% | 381.6M | 54.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TRUE | $2.54 | +14.93% | 225.9M | -12.10 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| FIRY | $9.74 | -0.81% | 152M | -2.42 | -$4.02 | N/A |
| AHG | $1.52 | +0.66% | 144M | -7.12 | -$0.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VRSK vs CART Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CART trades at $45.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CART's competition here
VRSK vs NTSK Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while NTSK trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check NTSK's competition here
VRSK vs TCGL Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TCGL's competition here
VRSK vs KEEL Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while KEEL trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check KEEL's competition here
VRSK vs KC Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while KC trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -31.38. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check KC's competition here
VRSK vs TRVG Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while TRVG trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TRVG's competition here
VRSK vs TRUE Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TRUE's competition here
VRSK vs FIRY Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, FIRY has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while FIRY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FIRY's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to FIRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to FIRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FIRY's competition here
VRSK vs AHG Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while AHG trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AHG's competition here
VRSK vs AIB Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, AIB has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while AIB trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AIB's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to AIB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AIB's competition here
VRSK vs ROC Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ROC has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while ROC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ROC's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to ROC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ROC's competition here
VRSK vs RSSS Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, RSSS has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while RSSS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas RSSS's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to RSSS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to RSSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RSSS's competition here
VRSK vs ZSQR Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while ZSQR trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ZSQR's competition here
VRSK vs IZEA Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while IZEA trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -121.00. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check IZEA's competition here
VRSK vs GIFT Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while GIFT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check GIFT's competition here
VRSK vs SST Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while SST trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check SST's competition here
VRSK vs ZGM Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while ZGM trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ZGM's competition here
VRSK vs ZTG Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while ZTG trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ZTG's competition here
VRSK vs HOLO Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while HOLO trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check HOLO's competition here
VRSK vs AGAE Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while AGAE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check AGAE's competition here
VRSK vs TGHL Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TGHL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while TGHL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TGHL's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to TGHL's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to TGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check TGHL's competition here
VRSK vs CHAI Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CHAI has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CHAI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CHAI's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CHAI's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to CHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CHAI's competition here
VRSK vs QCLS Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while QCLS trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check QCLS's competition here
VRSK vs CALD Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is -115.41. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CALD's competition here
VRSK vs XTLY Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check XTLY's competition here
VRSK vs ACTA Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check ACTA's competition here
VRSK vs CSC Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CSC's competition here
VRSK vs DWCH Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check DWCH's competition here
VRSK vs HDP Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check HDP's competition here
VRSK vs DWRE Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is -61.74. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check DWRE's competition here
VRSK vs CRA Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VRSK has daily volatility of 4.08 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
VRSK vs DST Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check DST's competition here
VRSK vs FUEL Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check FUEL's competition here
VRSK vs IMPV Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is -68.74. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check IMPV's competition here
VRSK vs PRGY Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VRSK has daily volatility of 4.08 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
VRSK vs RMGN Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check RMGN's competition here
VRSK vs CRTN Comparison July 2026
VRSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRSK stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRSK is priced at $188.35, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRSK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, VRSK's ROE is -21.38%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRSK is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRSK.Check CRTN's competition here