Vera Bradley, Inc.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while NKE trades at $61.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while DECK trades at $103.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while BIRK trades at $52.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while SKX trades at $62.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while CROX trades at $102.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CROX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while SHOO trades at $24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while WWW trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 457.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while CAL trades at $13.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 289M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while WEYS trades at $30.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 162.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while RCKY trades at $21.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while AREBW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while AREB trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AREB's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.

VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 66.8M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $2.39, while FORD trades at $6.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.