Volcon, Inc.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 959.49B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TSLA trades at $298.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 171.44. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 245.24B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TM trades at $187.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 244.80B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TOYOF trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 150.91B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BYDDF trades at $49.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 86.97B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RACE trades at $488.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 76.18B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BYDDY trades at $99.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 57.12B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VWAGY trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 57.10B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VLKAF trades at $115.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 56.95B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VWAPY trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 55.34B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MBGAF trades at $57.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 55.19B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MBGYY trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 53.92B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BAMXF trades at $87.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 53.29B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BYMOF trades at $76.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 53.26B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VLKPF trades at $108.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 48.08B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DRPRF trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 45.62B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GM trades at $47.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 45.47B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HNDAF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42.03B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 40.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while F-PC trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 40.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while F trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 40.50B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while F-PD trades at $21.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 40.35B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while F-PB trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 37.37B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TYIDY trades at $123.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 35.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TYIDF trades at $118.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 29.76B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HYMTF trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.12B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while STLA trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 24.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SZKMF trades at $12.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 23.97B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DRPRY trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 23.78B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SZKMY trades at $49.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 23.71B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GELYY trades at $47.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.58B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GWLLF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23.28B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GELYF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.23B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while EXXRF trades at $94.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.77B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while XPEV trades at $19.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.36. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 17.54B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FOVSY trades at $124.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 103.26. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 16.65B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while XPNGF trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RIVN trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 15.71B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HMC trades at $30.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15.59B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RNLSY trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.42B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FUJHY trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.36B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LI trades at $26.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.17B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FUJHF trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while POAHF trades at $41.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 12.15B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GWLLY trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ISUZY trades at $13.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GNZUF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VFS trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NSANF trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NSANF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NIO trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NSANY trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NIOIF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while JCYGY trades at $39.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while YAMHF trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LCID trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while YMHAY trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ISUZF trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ZK trades at $28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while POAHY trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VLVCY trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VLVOF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while IVCGF trades at $16.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while YADGF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MZDAF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MZDAY trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MMTOF trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while PSNY trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HINOY trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HINOF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LOT trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NFYEF trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -344.68. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while BLBD trades at $37.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while AMGDF trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 945.19M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ARGGY trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.90M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 710.66M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while PIAGF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682.01M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NAKD trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 637.33M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VFSWW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.60M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 202.02M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LVWR trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 130.59M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NIU trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 114.23M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FFAI trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FFIE trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 101.52M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LOTWW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while CJET trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.82M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FSR trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.28M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 27.01M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FHYDF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 26.48M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while CENN trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SOLO trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.65M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NRDE trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RIDE trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.50M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 18.38M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DMN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.83M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GP trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 12.06M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ECDA trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.58M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while PEV trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 10.44M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FLYE trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ARVL trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SVMH trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 6.12M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LOBO trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.71M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while EVTV trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GOEV trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 5.12M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while WKHS trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while HYZN trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while LFEV trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.19M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while AYRO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.30M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ZAPP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while EGOX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while VEV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 831513.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELEK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681583.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 557972.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while AIEV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 484784.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ECDAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 478320.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while MULN trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 456358.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while RONN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 422722.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GKIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386816.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365712.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104560.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while GACR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32318.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while CSBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14196.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8693.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 3675.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892.00. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while NDVR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, DDAIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is more volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, PTRA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while PTRA trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SEV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SEV's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ELMS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ELMS trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, ADOM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while ADOM trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, TTM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while TTM trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.

VLCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLCN stands at 2.65M. In comparison, SOLOW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VLCN is priced at $0.69, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLCN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLCN's ROE is -10.85%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLCN is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLCN.