UWM Holdings Corporation
UWM Holdings Corporation UWMC-WT Peers
See (UWMC-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
UWMC-WT vs RKT Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 23.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while RKT trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is 56.79. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs UWMC Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 12.69B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while UWMC trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs MMAC Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAI has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAI trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAI's P/E ratio is 1420.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKJ Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKJ has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKJ trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKJ's P/E ratio is 171.18. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs COOP Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while COOP trades at $117.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMA Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMA has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMA trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAJ Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAJ has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAJ trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAJ's P/E ratio is 1441.43. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAO Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAO has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAO trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAO's P/E ratio is 2428.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAM has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAM trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAM's P/E ratio is 2642.86. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAT Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAT has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAT trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAT's P/E ratio is 1608.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAH Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAH has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAH trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAH's P/E ratio is 1318.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAS Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAS has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAS trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAS's P/E ratio is 1754.29. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAG Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAG has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAG trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAG's P/E ratio is 2792.86. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMFN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMFN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMFN trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFN's P/E ratio is 2900.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMFN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMFM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMFM has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMFM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFM's P/E ratio is 2352.86. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMFM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAN trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAN's P/E ratio is 2500.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAK Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAK has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAK trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAK's P/E ratio is 2494.29. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAL Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAL has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAL trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAL's P/E ratio is 2517.14. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMFO Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMFO has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMFO trades at $39,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFO's P/E ratio is 5571428.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMFO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNMAP Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNMAP has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNMAP trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAP's P/E ratio is 2365.71. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNMAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNMAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs PFSI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while PFSI trades at $97.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCI has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCI trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCI's P/E ratio is 240.88. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FREGP Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FREGP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FREGP trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREGP's P/E ratio is 242.65. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREGP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FREGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCC Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCC has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCC trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCC's P/E ratio is -261.15. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKI has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKI trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKI's P/E ratio is 136.32. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCK Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCK has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCK trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCK's P/E ratio is 237.35. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCJ Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCJ has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCJ trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCJ's P/E ratio is 234.41. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKM trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKM's P/E ratio is 133.68. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCN trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCN's P/E ratio is 241.18. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCM trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCM's P/E ratio is 237.50. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKN trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKN's P/E ratio is 135.15. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCG Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCG has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCG trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCG's P/E ratio is 235.29. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCP Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCP trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCP's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKO Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKO trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKO's P/E ratio is 136.03. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKK Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKK has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKK trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKK's P/E ratio is -1178.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCL Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCL trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCL's P/E ratio is 239.12. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FREJN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FREJN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FREJN trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREJN's P/E ratio is 238.53. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREJN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FREJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCT Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCT has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCT trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCT's P/E ratio is 261.03. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKP Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKP's P/E ratio is 239.56. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCH Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCH has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCH trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCH's P/E ratio is 238.24. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCO Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCO trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCO's P/E ratio is 239.26. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCKL Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCKL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCKL trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKL's P/E ratio is 135.07. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCKL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FMCCS Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FMCCS has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FMCCS trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCS's P/E ratio is 228.53. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMCCS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FMCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs WD Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while WD trades at $72.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FNLIF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FNLIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FNLIF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLIF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNLIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FNLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs HMCBF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, HMCBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while HMCBF trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCBF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMCBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to HMCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs ECPG Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 832.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while ECPG trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs GHLD Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 797.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while GHLD trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs VEL Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 617.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while VEL trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs MAMTF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, MAMTF has a market cap of 532.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while MAMTF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMTF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAMTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to MAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs BRLGF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, BRLGF has a market cap of 453.49M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while BRLGF trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRLGF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to BRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs ATAX Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs TBCRF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, TBCRF has a market cap of 414.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while TBCRF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBCRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to TBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs AMIVF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, AMIVF has a market cap of 367.40M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while AMIVF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMIVF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to AMIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs LDI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 356.19M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while LDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs HMPT Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FCMGF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FCMGF has a market cap of 300.49M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FCMGF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMGF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCMGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs ONIT Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 299.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while ONIT trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs GHI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 276.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while GHI trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs SNFCA Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 251.08M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while SNFCA trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs BETR Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 215.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while BETR trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BETR's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs OCN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.87M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs CFSU Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, CFSU has a market cap of 94.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while CFSU trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFSU's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFSU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to CFSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs IOR Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 74.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while IOR trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs TFCCF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, TFCCF has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while TFCCF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFCCF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to TFCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs DVLN Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, DVLN has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while DVLN trades at $4,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVLN's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVLN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to DVLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs YBRHF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, YBRHF has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while YBRHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YBRHF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YBRHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to YBRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs TNSGF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, TNSGF has a market cap of 10.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while TNSGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNSGF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNSGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to TNSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs IMH Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs VRTB Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, VRTB has a market cap of 7.26M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while VRTB trades at $3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRTB's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to VRTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs LFLS Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, LFLS has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while LFLS trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLS's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is less volatile compared to LFLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs CNF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while CNF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs BETRW Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 1.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while BETRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs PAPL Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while PAPL trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs IMPM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, IMPM has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while IMPM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPM's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to IMPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs VAYK Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, VAYK has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while VAYK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAYK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to VAYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs FCRM Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, FCRM has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while FCRM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to FCRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs STXMF Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, STXMF has a market cap of 330922.00. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while STXMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STXMF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is less volatile compared to STXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs RFNS Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, RFNS has a market cap of 12510.00. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while RFNS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RFNS's ROE of +5.79%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is less volatile compared to RFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs NFSE Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, NFSE has a market cap of 3188.00. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while NFSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFSE's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to NFSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs SOHI Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, SOHI has a market cap of 1062.00. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while SOHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to SOHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs DOMR Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, DOMR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while DOMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOMR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to DOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
UWMC-WT vs TWAC Comparison
UWMC-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWMC-WT stands at 10.16B. In comparison, TWAC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UWMC-WT is priced at $0.14, while TWAC trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWMC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWMC-WT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWMC-WT is more volatile compared to TWAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWMC-WT.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $11.93 | -5.51% | 23.85B | 56.79 | $0.21 | +6.67% |
| UWMC | $4.75 | -2.77% | 12.69B | 36.50 | $0.13 | +8.36% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | N/A | 11.26B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| UWMC-WT | $0.14 | -17.00% | 10.16B | N/A | N/A | +8.36% |
| FNMAI | $9.94 | +3.54% | 7.59B | 1420.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FMCKJ | $11.64 | -0.09% | 7.57B | 171.18 | $0.07 | N/A |
| COOP | $117.54 | -2.52% | 7.52B | 13.09 | $8.98 | N/A |
| FNMA | $6.44 | +1.74% | 7.46B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNMAJ | $10.09 | +1.41% | 7.44B | 1441.43 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAO | $17.00 | N/A | 7.39B | 2428.57 | $0.01 | N/A |