Pineapple Financial Inc.
Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAPL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAPL | $1.10 | -0.45% | 1.4M | -0.18 | -$5.70 | N/A |
| RKT | $14.34 | +3.35% | 38.9B | -459.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| UWMC | $3.19 | +3.91% | 4.7B | 10.30 | $0.30 | +12.94% |
| PFSI | $86.44 | -0.67% | 4.5B | 9.13 | $9.41 | +1.40% |
| ADAMG | $25.33 | +0.48% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.00% |
| WD | $50.69 | +0.32% | 1.7B | 24.94 | $2.02 | +5.36% |
| ECPG | $80.70 | -1.07% | 1.7B | 6.25 | $12.84 | N/A |
| ADAMZ | $18.20 | +0.11% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +10.00% |
Stock Comparison
PAPL vs RKT Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while RKT trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -459.67. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check RKT's competition here
PAPL vs COOP Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check COOP's competition here
PAPL vs MMAC Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check MMAC's competition here
PAPL vs UWMC Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while UWMC trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check UWMC's competition here
PAPL vs PFSI Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while PFSI trades at $86.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check PFSI's competition here
PAPL vs ADAMG Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while ADAMG trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check ADAMG's competition here
PAPL vs WD Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while WD trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check WD's competition here
PAPL vs ECPG Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while ECPG trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check ECPG's competition here
PAPL vs ADAMZ Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while ADAMZ trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check ADAMZ's competition here
PAPL vs LADR Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while LADR trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check LADR's competition here
PAPL vs GHLD Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check GHLD's competition here
PAPL vs VEL Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while VEL trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check VEL's competition here
PAPL vs UWMC-WT Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
PAPL vs ATAX Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to ATAX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check ATAX's competition here
PAPL vs LDI Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while LDI trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check LDI's competition here
PAPL vs BETR Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while BETR trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check BETR's competition here
PAPL vs HMPT Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check HMPT's competition here
PAPL vs ONIT Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while ONIT trades at $34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check ONIT's competition here
PAPL vs SNFCA Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while SNFCA trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check SNFCA's competition here
PAPL vs OCN Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check OCN's competition here
PAPL vs GHI Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while GHI trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check GHI's competition here
PAPL vs IOR Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while IOR trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check IOR's competition here
PAPL vs TRBF Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TRBF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while TRBF trades at $49.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to TRBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to TRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check TRBF's competition here
PAPL vs CNF Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while CNF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check CNF's competition here
PAPL vs IMH Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check IMH's competition here
PAPL vs BETRW Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while BETRW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is less volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check BETRW's competition here
PAPL vs CSBK Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check CSBK's competition here
PAPL vs NSM Comparison May 2026
PAPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAPL stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAPL is priced at $1.10, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAPL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAPL's ROE is -4.85%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAPL is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAPL.Check NSM's competition here