CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while RKT trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check RKT's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while COOP trades at $210.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check COOP's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while MMAC trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check MMAC's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while PFSI trades at $84.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check PFSI's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while UWMC trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check UWMC's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while ECPG trades at $87.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check ECPG's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while WD trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check WD's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while LADR trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check LADR's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while GHLD trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check GHLD's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 841.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while ADAMG trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check ADAMG's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 838.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while ADAMZ trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check ADAMZ's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 699.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while VEL trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check VEL's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check UWMC-WT's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while BETRW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check BETRW's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check ATAX's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while BETR trades at $25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check BETR's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while LDI trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check LDI's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check HMPT's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 311.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while ONIT trades at $36.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check ONIT's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while SNFCA trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check SNFCA's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check OCN's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AFCGV has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while AFCGV trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AFCGV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AFCGV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is less volatile compared to AFCGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check AFCGV's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while GHI trades at $5.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check GHI's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while IOR trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check IOR's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check IMH's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while PAPL trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check PAPL's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while NSM trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check NSM's competition here

CNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNF stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNF is priced at $2.84, while CSBK trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNF is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNF.Check CSBK's competition here