Rocket Companies, Inc.
Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $14.28 | +2.92% | 38.9B | -459.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| UWMC | $3.17 | +3.09% | 4.7B | 10.30 | $0.30 | +12.94% |
| PFSI | $86.52 | -0.58% | 4.5B | 9.13 | $9.41 | +1.40% |
| ADAMG | $25.38 | +0.67% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.00% |
| WD | $50.74 | +0.42% | 1.7B | 24.94 | $2.02 | +5.36% |
| ECPG | $80.59 | -1.21% | 1.7B | 6.25 | $12.84 | N/A |
| ADAMZ | $18.26 | +0.41% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +10.00% |
| LADR | $10.22 | +2.35% | 1.3B | 23.02 | $0.44 | +9.08% |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs COOP Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check COOP's competition here
RKT vs MMAC Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check MMAC's competition here
RKT vs UWMC Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while UWMC trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC's competition here
RKT vs PFSI Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while PFSI trades at $86.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PFSI's competition here
RKT vs ADAMG Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while ADAMG trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMG's competition here
RKT vs WD Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while WD trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check WD's competition here
RKT vs ECPG Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while ECPG trades at $80.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ECPG's competition here
RKT vs ADAMZ Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while ADAMZ trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMZ's competition here
RKT vs LADR Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while LADR trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LADR's competition here
RKT vs GHLD Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHLD's competition here
RKT vs VEL Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while VEL trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check VEL's competition here
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
RKT vs ATAX Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATAX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ATAX's competition here
RKT vs LDI Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while LDI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LDI's competition here
RKT vs BETR Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while BETR trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETR's competition here
RKT vs HMPT Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check HMPT's competition here
RKT vs ONIT Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while ONIT trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ONIT's competition here
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while SNFCA trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check SNFCA's competition here
RKT vs OCN Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check OCN's competition here
RKT vs GHI Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while GHI trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHI's competition here
RKT vs IOR Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while IOR trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IOR's competition here
RKT vs TRBF Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, TRBF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while TRBF trades at $49.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas TRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to TRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check TRBF's competition here
RKT vs CNF Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while CNF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CNF's competition here
RKT vs IMH Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IMH's competition here
RKT vs BETRW Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while BETRW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETRW's competition here
RKT vs PAPL Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while PAPL trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PAPL's competition here
RKT vs CSBK Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CSBK's competition here
RKT vs NSM Comparison May 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 38.9B. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.28, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -459.67, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check NSM's competition here