Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $14.73 | +9.35% | 41.6B | 39.80 | $0.37 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| PFSI | $83.35 | +3.88% | 4.3B | 9.76 | $8.55 | +1.45% |
| UWMC | $2.02 | -0.49% | 3B | 5.90 | $0.34 | +19.66% |
| ECPG | $87.07 | +1.36% | 1.9B | 6.76 | $12.89 | N/A |
| WD | $53.00 | +3.62% | 1.8B | 14.45 | $3.67 | +5.11% |
| LADR | $10.23 | -0.10% | 1.3B | 23.31 | $0.44 | +8.97% |
| GHLD | $20.01 | +0.70% | 1.2B | 9.91 | $2.02 | +1.25% |
| ADAMG | $25.19 | +0.36% | 813.6M | 26.81 | $0.94 | +10.36% |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs COOP Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check COOP's competition here
RKT vs MMAC Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check MMAC's competition here
RKT vs PFSI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while PFSI trades at $83.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PFSI's competition here
RKT vs UWMC Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while UWMC trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC's competition here
RKT vs ECPG Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while ECPG trades at $87.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ECPG's competition here
RKT vs WD Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while WD trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check WD's competition here
RKT vs LADR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while LADR trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LADR's competition here
RKT vs GHLD Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHLD's competition here
RKT vs ADAMG Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 813.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while ADAMG trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMG's competition here
RKT vs ADAMZ Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 804.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while ADAMZ trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMZ's competition here
RKT vs VEL Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 697.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while VEL trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check VEL's competition here
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
RKT vs BETRW Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while BETRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETRW's competition here
RKT vs ATAX Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ATAX's competition here
RKT vs BETR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while BETR trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETR's competition here
RKT vs LDI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while LDI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LDI's competition here
RKT vs HMPT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check HMPT's competition here
RKT vs ONIT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while ONIT trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ONIT's competition here
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while SNFCA trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check SNFCA's competition here
RKT vs OCN Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check OCN's competition here
RKT vs AFCGV Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AFCGV has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while AFCGV trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas AFCGV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFCGV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to AFCGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check AFCGV's competition here
RKT vs GHI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while GHI trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHI's competition here
RKT vs IOR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while IOR trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IOR's competition here
RKT vs CNF Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while CNF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CNF's competition here
RKT vs IMH Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IMH's competition here
RKT vs PAPL Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while PAPL trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PAPL's competition here
RKT vs NSM Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check NSM's competition here
RKT vs CSBK Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.73, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 39.80, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CSBK's competition here