Ocwen Financial Corporation (OCN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCN | $25.08 | -0.75% | 195.9M | 33.89 | $0.74 | N/A |
| RKT | $15.00 | +1.49% | 42.3B | 40.49 | $0.37 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| PFSI | $86.08 | +2.11% | 4.5B | 10.07 | $8.55 | +1.41% |
| UWMC | $2.18 | +2.83% | 3.3B | 6.43 | $0.34 | +18.82% |
| ECPG | $90.62 | +3.71% | 1.9B | 7.03 | $12.89 | N/A |
| WD | $54.72 | +3.25% | 1.9B | 14.92 | $3.67 | +5.00% |
| LADR | $10.38 | +2.06% | 1.3B | 11.38 | $0.91 | +8.95% |
| GHLD | $20.01 | +0.70% | 1.2B | 9.91 | $2.02 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
OCN vs RKT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while RKT trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check RKT's competition here
OCN vs COOP Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check COOP's competition here
OCN vs MMAC Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check MMAC's competition here
OCN vs PFSI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while PFSI trades at $86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check PFSI's competition here
OCN vs UWMC Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while UWMC trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check UWMC's competition here
OCN vs ECPG Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ECPG trades at $90.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ECPG's competition here
OCN vs WD Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while WD trades at $54.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check WD's competition here
OCN vs LADR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while LADR trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check LADR's competition here
OCN vs GHLD Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check GHLD's competition here
OCN vs ADAMG Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 841.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ADAMG trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ADAMG's competition here
OCN vs ADAMZ Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 840.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ADAMZ trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ADAMZ's competition here
OCN vs VEL Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 713.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while VEL trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check VEL's competition here
OCN vs UWMC-WT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
OCN vs ATAX Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ATAX's competition here
OCN vs BETRW Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while BETRW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check BETRW's competition here
OCN vs BETR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while BETR trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check BETR's competition here
OCN vs LDI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while LDI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check LDI's competition here
OCN vs HMPT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check HMPT's competition here
OCN vs ONIT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ONIT trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ONIT's competition here
OCN vs SNFCA Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while SNFCA trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check SNFCA's competition here
OCN vs AFCGV Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, AFCGV has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while AFCGV trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas AFCGV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AFCGV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to AFCGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check AFCGV's competition here
OCN vs GHI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while GHI trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check GHI's competition here
OCN vs IOR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while IOR trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check IOR's competition here
OCN vs CNF Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while CNF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check CNF's competition here
OCN vs IMH Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check IMH's competition here
OCN vs PAPL Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while PAPL trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check PAPL's competition here
OCN vs CSBK Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check CSBK's competition here
OCN vs NSM Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check NSM's competition here