First Republic Bank
First Republic Bank (FRC-PL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRC-PL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRC-PL | $1.70 | -22.02% | 312.2M | 0.22 | $7.89 | +23.08% |
| JPM | $297.81 | -0.70% | 798.3B | 14.25 | $20.90 | +1.98% |
| JPM-PC | $24.91 | -0.36% | 787.5B | 1.85 | $13.48 | +1.98% |
| JPM-PD | $24.10 | -0.70% | 776.2B | 1.79 | $13.48 | +1.98% |
| BAC-PL | $1,196.00 | -1.08% | 443.5B | 340.35 | $3.51 | +2.22% |
| BAC | $49.77 | -0.16% | 353.2B | 12.35 | $4.03 | +2.22% |
| BAC-PK | $24.63 | -0.79% | 348.6B | 7.01 | $3.51 | +2.22% |
| BAC-PB | $24.84 | -0.52% | 347.1B | 7.07 | $3.51 | +2.22% |
| BML-PL | $19.65 | -0.51% | 333B | 5.59 | $3.51 | +2.22% |
| BML-PJ | $20.26 | -1.36% | 329.6B | 5.77 | $3.51 | +2.22% |
Stock Comparison
FRC-PL vs JPM Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 798.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM trades at $297.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 787.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PC trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PC's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PD Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 776.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PD trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PD's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PL Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 443.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PL trades at $1,196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 340.35. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PL's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 353.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC trades at $49.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PK Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 348.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PK trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PK's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PB Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 347.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PB trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PB's competition here
FRC-PL vs BML-PL Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 333B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BML-PL trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BML-PL's competition here
FRC-PL vs BML-PJ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 329.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BML-PJ trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BML-PJ's competition here
FRC-PL vs BML-PG Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 324.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BML-PG trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BML-PG's competition here
FRC-PL vs BML-PH Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 323.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BML-PH trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BML-PH's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PE Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 321.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PE trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PE's competition here
FRC-PL vs HSBC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 303.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while HSBC trades at $88.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check HSBC's competition here
FRC-PL vs RY Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 256.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while RY trades at $183.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check RY's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PL Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 240.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PL trades at $1,176.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.49. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PL's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC trades at $73.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC's competition here
FRC-PL vs MUFG Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while MUFG trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check MUFG's competition here
FRC-PL vs C Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, C has a market cap of 211.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while C trades at $123.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas C's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check C's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PQ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PY Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PY trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PY's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PR Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PR's competition here
FRC-PL vs TD Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 181.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while TD trades at $107.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check TD's competition here
FRC-PL vs SAN Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 172.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while SAN trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check SAN's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PM Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PM trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PM's competition here
FRC-PL vs UBS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while UBS trades at $45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check UBS's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PN Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PN trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PN's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PS trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PS's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PO Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PO trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PO's competition here
FRC-PL vs C-PJ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check C-PJ's competition here
FRC-PL vs BBVA Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BBVA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BBVA's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PQ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAC-PP Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAC-PP trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAC-PP's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PC trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.71. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PC's competition here
FRC-PL vs BMO Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BMO trades at $152.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BMO's competition here
FRC-PL vs CM Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while CM trades at $111.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check CM's competition here
FRC-PL vs RY-PT Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check RY-PT's competition here
FRC-PL vs BNS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BNS trades at $77.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BNS's competition here
FRC-PL vs ING Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while ING trades at $29.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check ING's competition here
FRC-PL vs SMFG Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while SMFG trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check SMFG's competition here
FRC-PL vs USB Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while USB trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check USB's competition here
FRC-PL vs BCS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BCS trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BCS's competition here
FRC-PL vs USB-PP Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while USB-PP trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check USB-PP's competition here
FRC-PL vs USB-PH Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while USB-PH trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check USB-PH's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PZ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PA Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PA trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PA's competition here
FRC-PL vs NU Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while NU trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check NU's competition here
FRC-PL vs WFC-PD Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WFC-PD trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WFC-PD's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PJ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PL Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PL trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PL's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PK Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PK trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PK's competition here
FRC-PL vs C-PK Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check C-PK's competition here
FRC-PL vs JPM-PM Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while JPM-PM trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check JPM-PM's competition here
FRC-PL vs NTRS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while NTRS trades at $163.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check NTRS's competition here
FRC-PL vs NWG Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while NWG trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check NWG's competition here
FRC-PL vs BAP Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while BAP trades at $316.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check BAP's competition here
FRC-PL vs USB-PR Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while USB-PR trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check USB-PR's competition here
FRC-PL vs USB-PQ Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while USB-PQ trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check USB-PQ's competition here
FRC-PL vs EWBC Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while EWBC trades at $119.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check EWBC's competition here
FRC-PL vs NTRSO Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while NTRSO trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check NTRSO's competition here
FRC-PL vs CS Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check CS's competition here
FRC-PL vs NTB Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while NTB trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check NTB's competition here
FRC-PL vs TANNL Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check TANNL's competition here
FRC-PL vs WBK Comparison May 2026
FRC-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRC-PL stands at 312.2M. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRC-PL is priced at $1.70, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRC-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.22, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, FRC-PL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC-PL is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC-PL.Check WBK's competition here