Wells Fargo & Company (WFC-PZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFC-PZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC-PZ | $18.39 | -0.59% | 58B | 3.81 | $4.83 | +2.14% |
| JPM-PJ | $19.20 | -0.21% | 902.6B | 1.43 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| JPM-PM | $17.09 | -0.52% | 896.3B | 1.27 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| JPM | $334.14 | +0.80% | 895.4B | 16.00 | $20.88 | +1.77% |
| JPM-PL | $18.58 | -0.48% | 867.3B | 1.39 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| JPM-PK | $18.28 | -0.49% | 862B | 1.36 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| JPM-PC | $25.25 | -0.12% | 797B | 1.87 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| JPM-PD | $23.98 | -0.50% | 770.6B | 1.78 | $13.48 | +1.77% |
| BAC-PL | $1,254.76 | +0.52% | 465.4B | 357.14 | $3.51 | +1.94% |
| BAC | $57.91 | +0.94% | 411.1B | 14.37 | $4.03 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 902.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 896.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PM trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PM's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 895.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM trades at $334.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 867.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PL trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 862B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PK trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PK's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 797B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PC trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 770.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while JPM-PD trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check JPM-PD's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 465.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PL trades at $1,254.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 357.14. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 411.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC trades at $57.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PM trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PM's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 396.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PS trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 396.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PN trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PN's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 396.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PO trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PO's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 395.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 394.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PP trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PP's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 349.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PB trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PB's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 346.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PK trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PK's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 328.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BML-PL trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BML-PL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 328.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while HSBC trades at $95.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check HSBC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 325.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BML-PJ trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BML-PJ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 320B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BML-PH trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BML-PH's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 315.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BML-PG trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BML-PG's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 309.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAC-PE trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAC-PE's competition here
WFC-PZ vs RY Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 283.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while RY trades at $202.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check RY's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 257.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PA trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PA's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 257.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC trades at $84.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 256B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PC trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 247.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PD trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PD's competition here
WFC-PZ vs C Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 247.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while C trades at $144.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check C's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 238B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PL trades at $1,165.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 241.11. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 227.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while MUFG trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check MUFG's competition here
WFC-PZ vs TD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while TD trades at $119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check TD's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs SAN Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while SAN trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check SAN's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PY trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PY's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WFC-PR's competition here
WFC-PZ vs UBS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 164.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while UBS trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check UBS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BBVA trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BBVA's competition here
WFC-PZ vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check C-PJ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BMO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BMO trades at $173.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BMO's competition here
WFC-PZ vs CM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while CM trades at $114.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check CM's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BNS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BNS trades at $86.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BNS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check RY-PT's competition here
WFC-PZ vs USB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while USB trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check USB's competition here
WFC-PZ vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while SMFG trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check SMFG's competition here
WFC-PZ vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while USB-PQ trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check USB-PQ's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BCS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BCS trades at $27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BCS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs ING Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while ING trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check ING's competition here
WFC-PZ vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while USB-PR trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ and USB-PR have similar daily volatility (0.71).Check USB-PR's competition here
WFC-PZ vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while USB-PP trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check USB-PP's competition here
WFC-PZ vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while USB-PH trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check USB-PH's competition here
WFC-PZ vs NU Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while NU trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check NU's competition here
WFC-PZ vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check C-PK's competition here
WFC-PZ vs NWG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while NWG trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check NWG's competition here
WFC-PZ vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while NTRS trades at $176.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check NTRS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while NTRSO trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check NTRSO's competition here
WFC-PZ vs BAP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while BAP trades at $368.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check BAP's competition here
WFC-PZ vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while EWBC trades at $130.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check EWBC's competition here
WFC-PZ vs CS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check CS's competition here
WFC-PZ vs NTB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while NTB trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check NTB's competition here
WFC-PZ vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check TANNL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs FRBT Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, FRBT has a market cap of 915.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while FRBT trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas FRBT's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to FRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check FRBT's competition here
WFC-PZ vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check FRC-PL's competition here
WFC-PZ vs WBK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PZ stands at 58B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PZ is priced at $18.39, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PZ currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PZ is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PZ.Check WBK's competition here