Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC | $83.23 | -0.69% | 251.6B | 12.42 | $6.62 | +2.19% |
| JPM-PL | $18.67 | -0.43% | 889.7B | 1.40 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PK | $18.34 | -0.43% | 889.2B | 1.37 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PM | $17.20 | -0.43% | 888.8B | 1.28 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PJ | $19.22 | -0.41% | 886.8B | 1.43 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM | $328.26 | -1.56% | 871.6B | 15.57 | $20.89 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PC | $25.31 | -0.12% | 800.8B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PD | $24.19 | -0.06% | 780.5B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| BAC-PL | $1,250.00 | +0.44% | 462.6B | 355.00 | $3.51 | +1.99% |
| BAC-PP | $16.70 | -0.30% | 410.8B | 4.79 | $3.51 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
WFC vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 889.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PL trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PL's competition here
WFC vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 889.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PK trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PK's competition here
WFC vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 888.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PM trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PM's competition here
WFC vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 886.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
WFC vs JPM Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 871.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM trades at $328.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM's competition here
WFC vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 800.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PC's competition here
WFC vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 780.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while JPM-PD trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check JPM-PD's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 462.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PL trades at $1,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 355.00. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PL's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 410.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PP trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PP's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 408.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 408.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PM trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PM's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 407.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PN trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PN's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 407B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PS trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PS's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 406.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PO trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PO's competition here
WFC vs BAC Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 398.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC trades at $57.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 351.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PB trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PB's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 349.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PK trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PK's competition here
WFC vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 330.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BML-PL trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BML-PL's competition here
WFC vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while HSBC trades at $96.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check HSBC's competition here
WFC vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BML-PJ trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BML-PJ's competition here
WFC vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 323.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BML-PH trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BML-PH's competition here
WFC vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 318.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BML-PG trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BML-PG's competition here
WFC vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 312.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAC-PE trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAC-PE's competition here
WFC vs RY Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 281.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while RY trades at $202.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check RY's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PC trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.69. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PC's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PA trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PA's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PD trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PD's competition here
WFC vs C Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 244.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while C trades at $145.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas C's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check C's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 240B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PL trades at $1,175.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.07. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PL's competition here
WFC vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 237.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while MUFG trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check MUFG's competition here
WFC vs TD Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while TD trades at $119.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check TD's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
WFC vs SAN Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 198.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while SAN trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check SAN's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 188.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PY trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PY's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PR's competition here
WFC vs UBS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while UBS trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check UBS's competition here
WFC vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BBVA trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BBVA's competition here
WFC vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check C-PJ's competition here
WFC vs BMO Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BMO trades at $173.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BMO's competition here
WFC vs BNS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BNS trades at $87.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BNS's competition here
WFC vs CM Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while CM trades at $113.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check CM's competition here
WFC vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check RY-PT's competition here
WFC vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while SMFG trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check SMFG's competition here
WFC vs USB Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while USB trades at $58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check USB's competition here
WFC vs ING Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while ING trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check ING's competition here
WFC vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while USB-PQ trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check USB-PQ's competition here
WFC vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while USB-PR trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check USB-PR's competition here
WFC vs BCS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BCS trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BCS's competition here
WFC vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while USB-PP trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check USB-PP's competition here
WFC vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while USB-PH trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check USB-PH's competition here
WFC vs NU Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while NU trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check NU's competition here
WFC vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
WFC vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check C-PK's competition here
WFC vs NWG Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while NWG trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check NWG's competition here
WFC vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while NTRSO trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check NTRSO's competition here
WFC vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while NTRS trades at $173.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check NTRS's competition here
WFC vs BAP Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while BAP trades at $381.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check BAP's competition here
WFC vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while EWBC trades at $128.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check EWBC's competition here
WFC vs CS Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check CS's competition here
WFC vs NTB Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while NTB trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check NTB's competition here
WFC vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check TANNL's competition here
WFC vs FRBT Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, FRBT has a market cap of 915.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while FRBT trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas FRBT's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to FRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check FRBT's competition here
WFC vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check FRC-PL's competition here
WFC vs WBK Comparison June 2026
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 251.6B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $83.23, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.42, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.Check WBK's competition here