Tupperware Brands Corporation
Tupperware Brands Corporation TUP Peers
See (TUP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUP | $0.51 | -57.51% | 23.7M | -0.06 | -$8.07 | N/A |
| IP | $50.43 | +0.08% | 26.6B | 43.10 | $1.17 | +3.67% |
| SW | $48.03 | +1.80% | 25.1B | 58.57 | $0.82 | +2.42% |
| AMCR | $9.63 | -0.62% | 22.2B | 17.20 | $0.56 | +5.27% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.36% |
| PKG | $202.29 | +0.17% | 18.2B | 21.14 | $9.57 | +2.47% |
| BALL | $58.73 | -0.02% | 16.3B | 33.37 | $1.76 | +1.36% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| CCK | $107.90 | +0.93% | 12.6B | 23.25 | $4.64 | +0.95% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
TUP vs IP Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while IP trades at $50.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 43.10. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs SW Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while SW trades at $48.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs AMCR Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while AMCR trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs BLL Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs PKG Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while PKG trades at $202.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs BALL Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while BALL trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs WRK Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs CCK Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while CCK trades at $107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs BERY Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs GPK Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while GPK trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs SLGN Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while SLGN trades at $56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs SEE Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while SEE trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs SON Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while SON trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 56.72. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs REYN Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while REYN trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs GEF Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while GEF trades at $69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs GEF-B Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while GEF-B trades at $73.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs PTVE Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs AMBP Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while AMBP trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -112.75. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs OI Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while OI trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs TRS Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while TRS trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs FFHL Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs KRT Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 584.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while KRT trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs MYE Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 580.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while MYE trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs PACK Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while PACK trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs YHGJ Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while YHGJ trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs MGIH Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while MGIH trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs DSS Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while DSS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs TYDE Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs OCTO Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while OCTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.
TUP vs ARD Comparison
TUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUP stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUP is priced at $0.51, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUP's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUP is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUP.