Sonoco Products Company

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BLL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while SW trades at $38.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 52.85. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SW's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while PKG trades at $215.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PKG's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while AMCR trades at $38.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMCR's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while IP trades at $31.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check IP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while BALL trades at $56.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BALL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check WRK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while AVY trades at $159.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AVY's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while CCK trades at $96.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check CCK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BERY's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while SEE trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SEE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while REYN trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check REYN's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while SLGN trades at $37.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SLGN's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PTVE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while GEF-B trades at $79.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF-B's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while GPK trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GPK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while GEF trades at $64.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while AMBP trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -405.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMBP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while TRS trades at $40.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 114.63. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TRS's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while OI trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OI's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 837.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while MYE trades at $22.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MYE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check FFHL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 537.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while PACK trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PACK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 530M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while KRT trades at $26.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check KRT's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while OCTO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OCTO's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TUP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while MGIH trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MGIH's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while YHGJ trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check YHGJ's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while DSS trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check DSS's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TYDE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while UNFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SON has daily volatility of 1.77 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $49.37, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check ARD's competition here