Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while SW trades at $44.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SW's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to BLL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BLL's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while PKG trades at $232.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check PKG's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while AMCR trades at $41.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AMCR's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while BALL trades at $60.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BALL's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check WRK's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while AVY trades at $167.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AVY's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while CCK trades at $109.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check CCK's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BERY's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while SEE trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SEE's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while SON trades at $48.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SON's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while GEF-B trades at $108.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GEF-B's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while SLGN trades at $37.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SLGN's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while GEF trades at $82.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GEF's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check PTVE's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while AMBP trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AMBP's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while GPK trades at $9.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GPK's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while TRS trades at $38.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TRS's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while MYE trades at $30.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check MYE's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while KRT trades at $49.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check KRT's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 932.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while OI trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas OI's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OI's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check OI's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check FFHL's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while OCTO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check OCTO's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TUP's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while MGIH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check MGIH's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while YHGJ trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check YHGJ's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while DSS trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSS's ROE of -6.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check DSS's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TYDE's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while UNFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is not fully comparable compared to UNFL. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check UNFL's competition here

Ranpak Holdings Corp. (NYSE: PACK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 342.2M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $3.98 on the NYSE, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.07, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check ARD's competition here