Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PACK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACK | $6.48 | -1.97% | 552.6M | -14.68 | -$0.44 | N/A |
| SW | $45.00 | -1.40% | 23.6B | 26.46 | $1.70 | +3.95% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $232.40 | -1.69% | 20.7B | 23.40 | $9.93 | +2.26% |
| AMCR | $44.45 | -0.38% | 20.6B | 11.80 | $3.77 | +5.82% |
| IP | $37.92 | -1.71% | 20.1B | -237.12 | -$0.16 | +4.88% |
| BALL | $62.66 | -0.46% | 16.7B | 16.63 | $3.77 | +1.27% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $164.35 | -1.02% | 12.6B | 16.94 | $9.71 | +2.32% |
| CCK | $112.48 | -0.71% | 12.6B | 14.08 | $7.99 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
PACK vs SW Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while SW trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SW's competition here
PACK vs BLL Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BLL's competition here
PACK vs PKG Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while PKG trades at $232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check PKG's competition here
PACK vs AMCR Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while AMCR trades at $44.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AMCR's competition here
PACK vs IP Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while IP trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -237.12. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check IP's competition here
PACK vs BALL Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while BALL trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BALL's competition here
PACK vs WRK Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check WRK's competition here
PACK vs AVY Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while AVY trades at $164.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AVY's competition here
PACK vs CCK Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while CCK trades at $112.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check CCK's competition here
PACK vs BERY Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check BERY's competition here
PACK vs SEE Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SEE's competition here
PACK vs SON Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while SON trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SON's competition here
PACK vs SLGN Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while SLGN trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check SLGN's competition here
PACK vs GEF-B Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while GEF-B trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GEF-B's competition here
PACK vs GEF Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while GEF trades at $73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GEF's competition here
PACK vs PTVE Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check PTVE's competition here
PACK vs GPK Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while GPK trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check GPK's competition here
PACK vs AMBP Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while AMBP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check AMBP's competition here
PACK vs OI Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while OI trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas OI's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check OI's competition here
PACK vs TRS Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while TRS trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TRS's competition here
PACK vs MYE Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while MYE trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check MYE's competition here
PACK vs FFHL Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check FFHL's competition here
PACK vs KRT Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 680.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while KRT trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check KRT's competition here
PACK vs OCTO Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check OCTO's competition here
PACK vs TUP Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TUP's competition here
PACK vs MGIH Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while MGIH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check MGIH's competition here
PACK vs YHGJ Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while YHGJ trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check YHGJ's competition here
PACK vs DSS Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while DSS trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check DSS's competition here
PACK vs TYDE Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check TYDE's competition here
PACK vs ARD Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACK is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACK.Check ARD's competition here
PACK vs UNFL Comparison July 2026
PACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACK stands at 552.6M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PACK is priced at $6.48, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.68, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PACK has daily volatility of 4.08 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here