Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBP | $4.04 | -0.74% | 2.4B | -405.00 | -$0.01 | +9.89% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $38.05 | +0.82% | 20B | 52.85 | $0.72 | +4.71% |
| PKG | $215.91 | +1.01% | 19.2B | 26.24 | $8.23 | +2.35% |
| AMCR | $38.38 | -0.31% | 17.7B | 30.70 | $1.25 | +6.66% |
| IP | $31.29 | -0.67% | 16.6B | -6.03 | -$5.19 | +5.95% |
| BALL | $56.51 | +0.28% | 15B | 16.47 | $3.43 | +1.43% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $159.66 | +0.48% | 12.2B | 17.99 | $8.88 | +2.36% |
| CCK | $96.71 | +0.26% | 10.8B | 15.37 | $6.29 | +1.27% |
Stock Comparison
AMBP vs BLL Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BLL's competition here
AMBP vs SW Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while SW trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 52.85. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SW's competition here
AMBP vs PKG Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while PKG trades at $215.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PKG's competition here
AMBP vs AMCR Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while AMCR trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check AMCR's competition here
AMBP vs IP Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while IP trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check IP's competition here
AMBP vs BALL Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while BALL trades at $56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BALL's competition here
AMBP vs WRK Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check WRK's competition here
AMBP vs AVY Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while AVY trades at $159.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check AVY's competition here
AMBP vs CCK Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while CCK trades at $96.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check CCK's competition here
AMBP vs BERY Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BERY's competition here
AMBP vs SEE Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SEE's competition here
AMBP vs SON Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while SON trades at $49.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SON's competition here
AMBP vs REYN Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while REYN trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check REYN's competition here
AMBP vs SLGN Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while SLGN trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SLGN's competition here
AMBP vs PTVE Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PTVE's competition here
AMBP vs GEF-B Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while GEF-B trades at $79.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF-B's competition here
AMBP vs GPK Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while GPK trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GPK's competition here
AMBP vs GEF Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while GEF trades at $64.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF's competition here
AMBP vs TRS Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while TRS trades at $40.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 114.63. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TRS's competition here
AMBP vs OI Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while OI trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OI's competition here
AMBP vs MYE Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 837.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while MYE trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MYE's competition here
AMBP vs FFHL Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check FFHL's competition here
AMBP vs PACK Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 537.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while PACK trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PACK's competition here
AMBP vs KRT Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 530M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while KRT trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check KRT's competition here
AMBP vs OCTO Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OCTO's competition here
AMBP vs TUP Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TUP's competition here
AMBP vs MGIH Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while MGIH trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MGIH's competition here
AMBP vs YHGJ Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while YHGJ trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check YHGJ's competition here
AMBP vs DSS Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while DSS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check DSS's competition here
AMBP vs TYDE Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TYDE's competition here
AMBP vs UNFL Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AMBP has daily volatility of 0.99 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
AMBP vs ARD Comparison May 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.04, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -405.00, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check ARD's competition here