Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRT | $34.25 | +1.24% | 683.8M | 21.14 | $1.62 | +5.26% |
| SW | $45.93 | -0.35% | 24.1B | 27.02 | $1.70 | +3.85% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $238.20 | +0.11% | 21.2B | 23.99 | $9.93 | +2.20% |
| AMCR | $45.00 | +3.12% | 20.8B | 11.94 | $3.77 | +5.75% |
| IP | $38.79 | +1.17% | 20.5B | -242.44 | -$0.16 | +4.77% |
| BALL | $63.39 | +2.66% | 16.9B | 16.81 | $3.77 | +1.26% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $166.97 | +2.36% | 12.8B | 17.20 | $9.71 | +2.29% |
| CCK | $113.29 | +1.72% | 12.7B | 14.18 | $7.99 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
KRT vs SW Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while SW trades at $45.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SW's competition here
KRT vs BLL Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BLL's competition here
KRT vs PKG Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while PKG trades at $238.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PKG's competition here
KRT vs AMCR Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while AMCR trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMCR's competition here
KRT vs IP Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while IP trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -242.44. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check IP's competition here
KRT vs BALL Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while BALL trades at $63.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BALL's competition here
KRT vs WRK Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check WRK's competition here
KRT vs AVY Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while AVY trades at $166.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AVY's competition here
KRT vs CCK Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while CCK trades at $113.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check CCK's competition here
KRT vs BERY Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BERY's competition here
KRT vs SEE Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SEE's competition here
KRT vs SON Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while SON trades at $57.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SON's competition here
KRT vs SLGN Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while SLGN trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SLGN's competition here
KRT vs GEF Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while GEF trades at $75.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF's competition here
KRT vs GEF-B Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while GEF-B trades at $92.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF-B's competition here
KRT vs PTVE Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PTVE's competition here
KRT vs GPK Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while GPK trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GPK's competition here
KRT vs AMBP Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while AMBP trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMBP's competition here
KRT vs TRS Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while TRS trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TRS's competition here
KRT vs OI Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while OI trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas OI's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OI's competition here
KRT vs MYE Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while MYE trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MYE's competition here
KRT vs FFHL Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check FFHL's competition here
KRT vs PACK Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 560.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while PACK trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PACK's competition here
KRT vs OCTO Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OCTO's competition here
KRT vs TUP Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TUP's competition here
KRT vs MGIH Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while MGIH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MGIH's competition here
KRT vs YHGJ Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while YHGJ trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check YHGJ's competition here
KRT vs DSS Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while DSS trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check DSS's competition here
KRT vs TYDE Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TYDE's competition here
KRT vs UNFL Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KRT has daily volatility of 3.67 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
KRT vs ARD Comparison July 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 683.8M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $34.25, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.14, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check ARD's competition here