Karat Packaging Inc.

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BLL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while SW trades at $39.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SW's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while PKG trades at $220.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PKG's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while AMCR trades at $37.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMCR's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while IP trades at $32.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check IP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while BALL trades at $60.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BALL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check WRK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while CCK trades at $99.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check CCK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BERY's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while SEE trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SEE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while SON trades at $49.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SON's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while REYN trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check REYN's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while SLGN trades at $39.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SLGN's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PTVE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while GEF trades at $66.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while GEF-B trades at $81.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF-B's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while GPK trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GPK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while AMBP trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -393.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMBP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while OI trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OI's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while TRS trades at $39.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 110.09. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TRS's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while MYE trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MYE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check FFHL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 479.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while PACK trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PACK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while OCTO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OCTO's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TUP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while MGIH trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MGIH's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while YHGJ trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check YHGJ's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while DSS trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check DSS's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TYDE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while UNFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KRT has daily volatility of 1.52 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 578.3M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $28.87, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.57, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check ARD's competition here