Ball Corporation
Ball Corporation (BALL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BALL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALL | $61.33 | +0.41% | 16.3B | 18.59 | $3.30 | +1.30% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $39.43 | +2.70% | 20.7B | 54.78 | $0.72 | +4.38% |
| PKG | $218.06 | +2.16% | 19.4B | 26.46 | $8.24 | +2.30% |
| AMCR | $37.75 | -0.75% | 17.4B | 28.38 | $1.33 | +6.82% |
| IP | $31.76 | +4.40% | 16.8B | -6.07 | -$5.23 | +5.81% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $100.15 | +1.87% | 11.2B | 15.92 | $6.29 | +1.12% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
| SEE | $42.15 | +0.02% | 6.2B | 14.10 | $2.99 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
BALL vs BLL Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check BLL's competition here
BALL vs SW Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while SW trades at $39.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SW's competition here
BALL vs PKG Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while PKG trades at $218.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PKG's competition here
BALL vs AMCR Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while AMCR trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check AMCR's competition here
BALL vs IP Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while IP trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check IP's competition here
BALL vs WRK Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check WRK's competition here
BALL vs CCK Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while CCK trades at $100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check CCK's competition here
BALL vs BERY Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check BERY's competition here
BALL vs SEE Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SEE's competition here
BALL vs SON Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while SON trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SON's competition here
BALL vs REYN Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while REYN trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check REYN's competition here
BALL vs SLGN Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while SLGN trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SLGN's competition here
BALL vs PTVE Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PTVE's competition here
BALL vs GEF Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while GEF trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GEF's competition here
BALL vs GEF-B Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while GEF-B trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GEF-B's competition here
BALL vs GPK Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while GPK trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GPK's competition here
BALL vs AMBP Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while AMBP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -393.00. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check AMBP's competition here
BALL vs OI Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while OI trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check OI's competition here
BALL vs TRS Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while TRS trades at $38.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 110.09. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TRS's competition here
BALL vs MYE Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while MYE trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check MYE's competition here
BALL vs FFHL Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check FFHL's competition here
BALL vs KRT Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 578.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while KRT trades at $28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check KRT's competition here
BALL vs PACK Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 479.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while PACK trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PACK's competition here
BALL vs OCTO Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCTO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check OCTO's competition here
BALL vs TUP Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TUP's competition here
BALL vs MGIH Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while MGIH trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check MGIH's competition here
BALL vs YHGJ Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while YHGJ trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check YHGJ's competition here
BALL vs DSS Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while DSS trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check DSS's competition here
BALL vs TYDE Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TYDE's competition here
BALL vs UNFL Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BALL has daily volatility of 1.42 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
BALL vs ARD Comparison May 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $61.33, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.59, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check ARD's competition here