Tata Motors Limited
Tata Motors Limited TTM Peers
See (TTM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTM | $25.14 | +1.04% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TSLA | $347.44 | +4.00% | 1.12T | 198.54 | $1.75 | N/A |
| TM | $186.92 | -3.63% | 243.91B | 7.58 | $24.65 | +1.24% |
| RACE | $495.55 | +0.95% | 88.31B | 49.90 | $9.93 | +0.61% |
| GM | $50.29 | -0.34% | 48.35B | 7.02 | $7.16 | +0.95% |
| F-PD | $21.45 | +0.42% | 41.96B | N/A | N/A | +7.03% |
| F-PC | $20.37 | -0.52% | 41.74B | N/A | N/A | +7.03% |
| F-PB | $20.42 | -0.87% | 41.70B | N/A | N/A | +7.03% |
| F | $10.64 | +0.38% | 41.56B | 8.51 | $1.25 | +7.03% |
| STLA | $10.84 | -1.14% | 31.04B | 5.23 | $2.07 | +7.96% |
Stock Comparison
TTM vs TSLA Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.12T. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while TSLA trades at $347.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 198.54. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs TM Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 243.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while TM trades at $186.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs RACE Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 88.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RACE trades at $495.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs GM Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 48.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GM trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs F-PD Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 41.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PD trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs F-PC Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PC trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs F-PB Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PB trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs F Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, F has a market cap of 41.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs STLA Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 31.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while STLA trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs XPEV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 19.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while XPEV trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs RIVN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 16.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RIVN trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LI Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LI trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs HMC Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while HMC trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs NIO Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NIO trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs VFS Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VFS trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LCID Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LCID trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs ZK Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ZK trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs PSNY Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PSNY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LOT Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs BLBD Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while BLBD trades at $39.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs VFSWW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 701.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VFSWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs NAKD Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LVWR Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 210.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LVWR trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs NIU Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 138.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NIU trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FFAI Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 116.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FFIEW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FFIE Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LOTWW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 101.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOTWW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs CJET Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 69.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while CJET trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FSR Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs CENN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while CENN trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs SOLO Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs RIDE Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs DMN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 18.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while DMN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs ECDA Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 13.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ECDA trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FLYE Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 13.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FLYE trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs GP Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 13.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GP trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs PEV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs ARVL Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs SVMH Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs LOBO Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 7.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOBO trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs EVTV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while EVTV trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs GOEV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs WKHS Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while WKHS trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs HYZN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs MULN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while MULN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs AYRO Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while AYRO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs PSNYW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs VLCN Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VLCN trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs EGOX Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs VEV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs ZAPP Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ZAPP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs FFAIW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 1.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFAIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs AIEV Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 710146.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while AIEV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs ECDAW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 594479.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.
TTM vs GOEVW Comparison
TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at N/A. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365712.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.