Titan America S.A.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TTAM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TTAM
Titan America S.A. (TTAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | $16.04 | +0.50% | 3B | 15.95 | $1.01 | +1.00% |
| CRH | $115.07 | -0.37% | 78.8B | 21.39 | $5.51 | +1.27% |
| VMC | $291.93 | -0.37% | 38.6B | 36.30 | $8.14 | +0.68% |
| MLM | $620.52 | -0.80% | 38.1B | 38.63 | $16.36 | +0.52% |
| AMRZ | $57.66 | +0.46% | 32.1B | 27.12 | $2.14 | N/A |
| CX | $11.74 | -1.43% | 17.3B | 44.13 | $0.27 | +0.75% |
| JHX | $20.73 | -0.10% | 12.2B | 87.63 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $196.19 | -0.56% | 6.4B | 15.07 | $13.23 | +0.50% |
| KNF | $82.84 | -3.07% | 4.8B | 27.56 | $3.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTAM vs CRH Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while CRH trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CRH's competition here
TTAM vs VMC Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while VMC trades at $291.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check VMC's competition here
TTAM vs MLM Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while MLM trades at $620.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check MLM's competition here
TTAM vs AMRZ Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while AMRZ trades at $57.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check AMRZ's competition here
TTAM vs CX Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while CX trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CX's competition here
TTAM vs JHX Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while JHX trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 87.63. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check JHX's competition here
TTAM vs SUM Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SUM's competition here
TTAM vs EXP Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while EXP trades at $196.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check EXP's competition here
TTAM vs KNF Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while KNF trades at $82.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check KNF's competition here
TTAM vs USLM Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while USLM trades at $137.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USLM's competition here
TTAM vs BCC Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while BCC trades at $79.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check BCC's competition here
TTAM vs TGLS Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while TGLS trades at $44.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check TGLS's competition here
TTAM vs LOMA Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while LOMA trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 77.27. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check LOMA's competition here
TTAM vs CPAC Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 917.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while CPAC trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CPAC's competition here
TTAM vs SMID Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while SMID trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SMID's competition here
TTAM vs FEAM Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while FEAM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check FEAM's competition here
TTAM vs CAPS Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while CAPS trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CAPS's competition here
TTAM vs RETO Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 416.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while RETO trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check RETO's competition here
TTAM vs USCR Comparison April 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.04, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.95, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USCR's competition here