Tesla, Inc.
Tesla, Inc. TSLA Peers
See (TSLA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | $294.96 | +0.35% | 957.9B | 171.16 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $170.36 | +1.49% | 222.1B | 6.92 | $24.59 | +3.17% |
| RACE | $489.21 | +0.59% | 87.2B | 47.07 | $10.39 | +1.22% |
| GM | $52.61 | +1.52% | 50.2B | 7.29 | $7.16 | +1.21% |
| F-PC | $21.58 | +2.43% | 47B | N/A | N/A | +6.42% |
| F | $11.86 | +2.29% | 45.7B | 9.35 | $1.25 | +6.42% |
| F-PB | $21.99 | +3.34% | 43.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.42% |
| F-PD | $23.53 | +3.32% | 43B | N/A | N/A | +6.42% |
| STLA | $10.24 | +4.44% | 28.9B | 4.65 | $2.17 | +23.95% |
| XPEV | $17.59 | -1.79% | 16.3B | -23.92 | -$0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TSLA vs TM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while TM trades at $170.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RACE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while RACE trades at $489.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 47.07. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while GM trades at $52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PC Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while F-PC trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while F trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PB Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while F-PB trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while F-PD trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs STLA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while STLA trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs XPEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while XPEV trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RIVN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while RIVN trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs HMC Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while HMC trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LI Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LI trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VFS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while VFS trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NIO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while NIO trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LCID Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LCID trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ZK Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ZK trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PSNY Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while PSNY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOT Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LOT trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs BLBD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while BLBD trades at $45.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LVWR Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 802.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LVWR trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NAKD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VFSWW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PSNYW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 344M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NIU Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 277.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while NIU trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FLYE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FLYE trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -71.51. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFAI Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FFAI trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFIE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFIEW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOTWW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs CJET Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while CJET trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FSR Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs CENN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while CENN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs WKHS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while WKHS trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SOLO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RIDE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SVMH Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ECDAW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ECDAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GP Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while GP trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ECDA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ECDA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ARVL Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs AIEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while AIEV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GOEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs HYZN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs EVTV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs DMN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOBO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while LOBO trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VLCN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while VLCN trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs AYRO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while AYRO trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFAIW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ZAPP Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs MULN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 418.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while MULN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GOEVW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs EGOX Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SOLOW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PTRA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs TTM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ADOM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ELMS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 957.9B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $294.96, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 171.16, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.