Tesla, Inc.
Tesla, Inc. TSLA Peers
See (TSLA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | $316.28 | -3.90% | 1T | 179.71 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TM | $173.96 | -2.09% | 227B | 6.98 | $24.94 | +3.11% |
| RACE | $460.60 | -0.91% | 82.1B | 45.38 | $10.15 | +0.64% |
| GM | $48.28 | -2.01% | 46.4B | 6.74 | $7.16 | +1.05% |
| F-PD | $22.50 | +0.90% | 42.8B | N/A | N/A | +7.22% |
| F-PB | $21.18 | +0.19% | 42.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.22% |
| F-PC | $21.05 | +0.17% | 41.8B | N/A | N/A | +7.22% |
| F | $10.43 | -1.84% | 40.7B | 8.34 | $1.25 | +7.22% |
| STLA | $9.60 | -2.69% | 27.5B | 4.53 | $2.12 | +9.26% |
| XPEV | $18.58 | -0.40% | 17.9B | -24.77 | -$0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TSLA vs TM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while TM trades at $173.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RACE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while RACE trades at $460.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 45.38. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while GM trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while F-PD trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PB Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while F-PB trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F-PC Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while F-PC trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs F Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, F has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while F trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs STLA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while STLA trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs XPEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while XPEV trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RIVN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while RIVN trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs HMC Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while HMC trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LI Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LI trades at $26.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VFS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while VFS trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NIO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while NIO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ZK Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ZK trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LCID Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LCID trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PSNY Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while PSNY trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOT Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LOT trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs BLBD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while BLBD trades at $41.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LVWR Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LVWR trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NAKD Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VFSWW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PSNYW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs NIU Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while NIU trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFAI Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FFAI trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFIE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFIEW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOTWW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FSR Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs CJET Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while CJET trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FLYE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FLYE trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs CENN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while CENN trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SOLO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs RIDE Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GP Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while GP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ECDA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ECDA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs WKHS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while WKHS trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ARVL Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SVMH Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GOEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs LOBO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while LOBO trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs AIEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while AIEV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs HYZN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs DMN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs EVTV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while EVTV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs AYRO Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while AYRO trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs FFAIW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs EGOX Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VLCN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while VLCN trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs VEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs MULN Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while MULN trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ZAPP Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ECDAW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 523.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ECDAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs GOEVW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs TTM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ELMS Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SEV Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs ADOM Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs PTRA Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.
TSLA vs SOLOW Comparison
TSLA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSLA stands at 1T. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSLA is priced at $316.28, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSLA currently has a P/E ratio of 179.71, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSLA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TSLA is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSLA.