Trupanion, Inc.

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while FNF trades at $58.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check FNF's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while RYAN trades at $57.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 139.30. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check RYAN's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AIZ trades at $210.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AIZ's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while FAF trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check FAF's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while MTG trades at $27.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check MTG's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while ESNT trades at $57.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check ESNT's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while ACT trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check ACT's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while RDN trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check RDN's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AGO trades at $86.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AGO's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while NMIH trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check NMIH's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 968.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while EIG trades at $41.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check EIG's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 850.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AMSF trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AMSF's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while TIPT trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check TIPT's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 721.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while HIPO trades at $31.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HIPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check HIPO's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 417.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while ITIC trades at $224.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check ITIC's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AMBC trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AMBC's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while MBI trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check MBI's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while JRVR trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JRVR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check JRVR's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check ICCH's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AIFU trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AIFU's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check AMBC-WT's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check TIG's competition here

TRUP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRUP stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUP is priced at $48.63, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRUP currently has a P/E ratio of -488.10, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, TRUP's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUP is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUP.Check PROS's competition here