Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check HIPO-WT's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while FNF trades at $42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check FNF's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while FAF trades at $69.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check FAF's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while ESNT trades at $67.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ESNT's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while MTG trades at $29.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check MTG's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while RDN trades at $35.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check RDN's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while NMIH trades at $42.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check NMIH's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while AGO trades at $70.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AGO's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while EIG trades at $48.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 85.82. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check EIG's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 652.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while TIPT trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check TIPT's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 545.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while ITIC trades at $289.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ITIC's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while AMSF trades at $24.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMSF's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMBC's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while MBI trades at $4.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check MBI's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while OSG trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -56.25. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check OSG's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while JRVR trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check JRVR's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ICCH's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check PROS's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while SNC trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check SNC's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check TIG's competition here

Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $48.45 on the NASDAQ, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMBC-WT's competition here