Enact Holdings, Inc.

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check HIPO-WT's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while FNF trades at $50.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check FNF's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AIZ trades at $229.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AIZ's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while FAF trades at $66.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check FAF's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while MTG trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check MTG's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while ESNT trades at $63.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ESNT's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while RDN trades at $35.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check RDN's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while RYAN trades at $36.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 77.26. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check RYAN's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AGO trades at $83.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AGO's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while NMIH trades at $40.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check NMIH's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while TRUP trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check TRUP's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 971.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while EIG trades at $41.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 90.28. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check EIG's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 748.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while HIPO trades at $28.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check HIPO's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 649.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while TIPT trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check TIPT's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AMSF trades at $29.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMSF's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while ITIC trades at $236.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ITIC's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMBC's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while MBI trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check MBI's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while JRVR trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check JRVR's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while OSG trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check OSG's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AIFU trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AIFU's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check ICCH's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while FBDC trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check FBDC's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check TIG's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check AMBC-WT's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check PROS's competition here

ACT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACT is priced at $43.35, while SNC trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.59, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACT is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACT.Check SNC's competition here