MGIC Investment Corporation

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check HIPO-WT's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while FNF trades at $51.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check FNF's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AIZ trades at $230.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AIZ's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while FAF trades at $68.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check FAF's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while ACT trades at $43.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ACT's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while ESNT trades at $64.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ESNT's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while RDN trades at $35.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check RDN's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while RYAN trades at $35.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 75.32. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check RYAN's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AGO trades at $83.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AGO's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while NMIH trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check NMIH's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while TRUP trades at $26.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 59.64. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TRUP's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while EIG trades at $42.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 91.76. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check EIG's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 739.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while HIPO trades at $28.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check HIPO's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 654.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while TIPT trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TIPT's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AMSF trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMSF's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 459M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while ITIC trades at $243.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ITIC's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMBC's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while MBI trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check MBI's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while JRVR trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check JRVR's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while OSG trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check OSG's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AIFU trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AIFU's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ICCH's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while FBDC trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check FBDC's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TIG's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMBC-WT's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check PROS's competition here

MTG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $28.77, while SNC trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.16, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check SNC's competition here