MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check HIPO-WT's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while FNF trades at $51.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check FNF's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while AIZ trades at $276.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AIZ's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while FAF trades at $75.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check FAF's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while ESNT trades at $65.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ESNT's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while RYAN trades at $41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check RYAN's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while RDN trades at $38.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check RDN's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while AGO trades at $85.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AGO's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while NMIH trades at $42.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check NMIH's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while EIG trades at $49.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 87.40. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check EIG's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while TRUP trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TRUP's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 721.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while HIPO trades at $27.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check HIPO's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 668.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while TIPT trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TIPT's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 568.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while AMSF trades at $30.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMSF's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 533.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while ITIC trades at $282.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ITIC's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMBC's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 288M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while MBI trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check MBI's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while OSG trades at $5.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check OSG's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while JRVR trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check JRVR's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check ICCH's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check TIG's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check PROS's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while SNC trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check SNC's competition here

MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTG stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTG is priced at $29.65 on the NYSE, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTG currently has a P/E ratio of 9.39, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTG is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTG.Check AMBC-WT's competition here