AMERISAFE, Inc.
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMSF | $30.31 | +0.17% | 566.9M | 12.47 | $2.43 | +8.47% |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $47.60 | -1.43% | 12.8B | 16.94 | $2.81 | +4.20% |
| AIZ | $243.43 | -0.29% | 12.1B | 12.48 | $19.51 | +1.38% |
| FAF | $67.83 | -0.91% | 6.9B | 10.44 | $6.50 | +3.23% |
| ACT | $42.80 | -0.14% | 6B | 9.26 | $4.62 | +1.96% |
| ESNT | $60.87 | -0.98% | 5.7B | 8.66 | $7.03 | +2.09% |
| MTG | $26.06 | -0.15% | 5.5B | 8.28 | $3.15 | +2.29% |
| RDN | $37.20 | -0.96% | 5B | 8.57 | $4.34 | +2.74% |
| RYAN | $31.51 | +0.70% | 4.1B | 38.43 | $0.82 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
AMSF vs HIPO-WT Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
AMSF vs FNF Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while FNF trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check FNF's competition here
AMSF vs AIZ Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while AIZ trades at $243.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check AIZ's competition here
AMSF vs FAF Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while FAF trades at $67.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check FAF's competition here
AMSF vs ACT Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while ACT trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check ACT's competition here
AMSF vs ESNT Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while ESNT trades at $60.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check ESNT's competition here
AMSF vs MTG Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while MTG trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check MTG's competition here
AMSF vs RDN Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while RDN trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check RDN's competition here
AMSF vs RYAN Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while RYAN trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check RYAN's competition here
AMSF vs AGO Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while AGO trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check AGO's competition here
AMSF vs NMIH Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while NMIH trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check NMIH's competition here
AMSF vs TRUP Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while TRUP trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check TRUP's competition here
AMSF vs EIG Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 914.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while EIG trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 89.87. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check EIG's competition here
AMSF vs HIPO Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 698.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while HIPO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check HIPO's competition here
AMSF vs TIPT Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 637.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while TIPT trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -17.13. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check TIPT's competition here
AMSF vs ITIC Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while ITIC trades at $236.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check ITIC's competition here
AMSF vs AMBC Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check AMBC's competition here
AMSF vs MBI Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while MBI trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check MBI's competition here
AMSF vs OSG Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while OSG trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check OSG's competition here
AMSF vs JRVR Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 194.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while JRVR trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check JRVR's competition here
AMSF vs AIFU Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while AIFU trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIFU's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check AIFU's competition here
AMSF vs ICCH Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check ICCH's competition here
AMSF vs FBDC Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while FBDC trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check FBDC's competition here
AMSF vs PROS Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check PROS's competition here
AMSF vs TIG Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check TIG's competition here
AMSF vs SNC Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check SNC's competition here
AMSF vs AMBC-WT Comparison May 2026
AMSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSF stands at 566.9M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMSF is priced at $30.31, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSF is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSF.Check AMBC-WT's competition here