Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (AMBC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBC | $8.29 | +0.00% | 397.4M | -8.46 | -$0.98 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $50.63 | -0.10% | 13.7B | 22.91 | $2.21 | +2.05% |
| AIZ | $229.07 | +0.05% | 11.4B | 13.54 | $16.92 | +0.77% |
| FAF | $66.48 | -0.63% | 6.8B | 11.08 | $6.00 | +1.64% |
| ACT | $43.35 | +0.28% | 6.1B | 9.59 | $4.52 | +0.97% |
| MTG | $28.17 | +0.68% | 6.1B | 8.97 | $3.14 | +1.07% |
| ESNT | $63.15 | -0.03% | 6B | 9.16 | $6.90 | +1.04% |
| RDN | $35.58 | +0.59% | 4.8B | 8.11 | $4.39 | +1.44% |
| RYAN | $36.29 | -5.12% | 4.7B | 77.26 | $0.47 | +0.65% |
Stock Comparison
AMBC vs HIPO-WT Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
AMBC vs FNF Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while FNF trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check FNF's competition here
AMBC vs AIZ Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while AIZ trades at $229.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AIZ's competition here
AMBC vs FAF Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while FAF trades at $66.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check FAF's competition here
AMBC vs ACT Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while ACT trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ACT's competition here
AMBC vs MTG Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while MTG trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check MTG's competition here
AMBC vs ESNT Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while ESNT trades at $63.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ESNT's competition here
AMBC vs RDN Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while RDN trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check RDN's competition here
AMBC vs RYAN Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while RYAN trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 77.26. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check RYAN's competition here
AMBC vs AGO Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while AGO trades at $83.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AGO's competition here
AMBC vs NMIH Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while NMIH trades at $40.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check NMIH's competition here
AMBC vs TRUP Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while TRUP trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TRUP's competition here
AMBC vs EIG Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 971.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while EIG trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 90.28. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check EIG's competition here
AMBC vs HIPO Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 748.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while HIPO trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check HIPO's competition here
AMBC vs TIPT Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 649.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while TIPT trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TIPT's competition here
AMBC vs AMSF Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while AMSF trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AMSF's competition here
AMBC vs ITIC Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while ITIC trades at $236.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ITIC's competition here
AMBC vs MBI Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while MBI trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check MBI's competition here
AMBC vs JRVR Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while JRVR trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check JRVR's competition here
AMBC vs OSG Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while OSG trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check OSG's competition here
AMBC vs AIFU Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while AIFU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AIFU's competition here
AMBC vs ICCH Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ICCH's competition here
AMBC vs FBDC Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while FBDC trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check FBDC's competition here
AMBC vs TIG Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TIG's competition here
AMBC vs AMBC-WT Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
AMBC vs PROS Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check PROS's competition here
AMBC vs SNC Comparison April 2026
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 397.4M. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.29, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check SNC's competition here