TriMas Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRS
TriMas Corporation (TRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRS | $38.63 | +1.90% | 1.6B | 21.70 | $1.78 | +0.41% |
| SW | $42.14 | -0.33% | 22.1B | 31.69 | $1.33 | +4.12% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| IP | $36.78 | -0.78% | 19.5B | -6.55 | -$5.61 | +5.01% |
| AMCR | $41.76 | -1.44% | 19.3B | 31.41 | $1.33 | +6.14% |
| PKG | $208.12 | -1.39% | 18.6B | 24.22 | $8.59 | +2.39% |
| BALL | $62.87 | +1.24% | 16.7B | 19.05 | $3.30 | +1.27% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $107.84 | +0.63% | 12.2B | 16.91 | $6.38 | +1.05% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRS vs SW Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while SW trades at $42.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check SW's competition here
TRS vs BLL Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check BLL's competition here
TRS vs IP Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while IP trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check IP's competition here
TRS vs AMCR Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while AMCR trades at $41.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check AMCR's competition here
TRS vs PKG Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while PKG trades at $208.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check PKG's competition here
TRS vs BALL Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while BALL trades at $62.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check BALL's competition here
TRS vs WRK Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check WRK's competition here
TRS vs CCK Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while CCK trades at $107.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check CCK's competition here
TRS vs BERY Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check BERY's competition here
TRS vs SEE Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check SEE's competition here
TRS vs SON Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while SON trades at $56.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check SON's competition here
TRS vs REYN Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while REYN trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check REYN's competition here
TRS vs SLGN Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while SLGN trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check SLGN's competition here
TRS vs GEF-B Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while GEF-B trades at $92.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check GEF-B's competition here
TRS vs GEF Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while GEF trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check GEF's competition here
TRS vs PTVE Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check PTVE's competition here
TRS vs GPK Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while GPK trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check GPK's competition here
TRS vs AMBP Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while AMBP trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -207.00. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check AMBP's competition here
TRS vs OI Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while OI trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check OI's competition here
TRS vs MYE Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while MYE trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check MYE's competition here
TRS vs FFHL Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check FFHL's competition here
TRS vs KRT Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 599.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while KRT trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check KRT's competition here
TRS vs PACK Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while PACK trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check PACK's competition here
TRS vs OCTO Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check OCTO's competition here
TRS vs TUP Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check TUP's competition here
TRS vs MGIH Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while MGIH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check MGIH's competition here
TRS vs DSS Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while DSS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check DSS's competition here
TRS vs YHGJ Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while YHGJ trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check YHGJ's competition here
TRS vs TYDE Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check TYDE's competition here
TRS vs UNFL Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRS has daily volatility of 3.62 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
TRS vs ARD Comparison April 2026
TRS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRS is priced at $38.63, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.70, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRS is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRS.Check ARD's competition here