Toyota Motor Corp
Toyota Motor Corp (TOM.HM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TOM.HM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: NaN Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOM.HM | €18.55 | -1.01% | 241.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.05% |
| TOM.BE | €18.21 | +0.32% | 237.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.11% |
| CEBU.DE | €5.50 | -0.17% | 6.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 7CD.BE | €56.88 | +0.32% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.41% |
| CBU2.DE | €5.42 | -0.29% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 5FB.DE | €5.34 | +0.00% | 1.6B | -6.46 | -€0.83 | N/A |
| 0P00000XI7.F | €53.14 | -0.70% | 367.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SPV2.DE | €9.80 | -2.00% | 257.3M | -4.21 | -€2.33 | N/A |
| EH1Y.DE | €4.81 | -0.23% | 181.3M | N/A | N/A | +5.61% |
| QUTM.DE | €20.51 | +0.05% | 171.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOM.HM vs TOM.BE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, TOM.BE has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while TOM.BE trades at €18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.BE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to TOM.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TOM.BE's competition here
TOM.HM vs CEBU.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, CEBU.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while CEBU.DE trades at €5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEBU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to CEBU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check CEBU.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 7CD.BE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, 7CD.BE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while 7CD.BE trades at €56.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 7CD.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7CD.BE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 7CD.BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 7CD.BE's competition here
TOM.HM vs CBU2.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, CBU2.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while CBU2.DE trades at €5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBU2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to CBU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check CBU2.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 5FB.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, 5FB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while 5FB.DE trades at €5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5FB.DE's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5FB.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 5FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 5FB.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 0P00000XI7.F Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, 0P00000XI7.F has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while 0P00000XI7.F trades at €53.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000XI7.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0P00000XI7.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to 0P00000XI7.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 0P00000XI7.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs SPV2.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, SPV2.DE has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while SPV2.DE trades at €9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPV2.DE's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPV2.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to SPV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check SPV2.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs EH1Y.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, EH1Y.DE has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while EH1Y.DE trades at €4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EH1Y.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EH1Y.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to EH1Y.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check EH1Y.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs QUTM.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, QUTM.DE has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while QUTM.DE trades at €20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUTM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QUTM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to QUTM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check QUTM.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs BLCH.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, BLCH.DE has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while BLCH.DE trades at €12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLCH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLCH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to BLCH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check BLCH.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs RARE.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, RARE.DE has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while RARE.DE trades at €50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RARE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RARE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to RARE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check RARE.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs HBF.F Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, HBF.F has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while HBF.F trades at €0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBF.F's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBF.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to HBF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check HBF.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs TTI.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, TTI.DE has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while TTI.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTI.DE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to TTI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TTI.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs WQTM.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, WQTM.DE has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while WQTM.DE trades at €25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQTM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WQTM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to WQTM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check WQTM.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs EBEN.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, EBEN.DE has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while EBEN.DE trades at €3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBEN.DE's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBEN.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to EBEN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check EBEN.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs ADD.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check ADD.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs XMWJ.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, XMWJ.DE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while XMWJ.DE trades at €35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMWJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XMWJ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to XMWJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check XMWJ.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs CURK.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, CURK.DE has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while CURK.DE trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURK.DE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURK.DE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to CURK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check CURK.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 1EZ0.BE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, 1EZ0.BE has a market cap of 372.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while 1EZ0.BE trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1EZ0.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1EZ0.BE's ROE of +3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to 1EZ0.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 1EZ0.BE's competition here
TOM.HM vs OD7M.SG Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, OD7M.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while OD7M.SG trades at €19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OD7M.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OD7M.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to OD7M.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check OD7M.SG's competition here
TOM.HM vs O2D.SG Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, O2D.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while O2D.SG trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O2D.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to O2D.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to O2D.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check O2D.SG's competition here
TOM.HM vs P6K0.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, P6K0.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while P6K0.DE trades at €0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P6K0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to P6K0.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to P6K0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check P6K0.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs GFJ1.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, GFJ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while GFJ1.DE trades at €10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFJ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFJ1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to GFJ1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check GFJ1.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs UNI2.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, UNI2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while UNI2.DE trades at €50.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNI2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNI2.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to UNI2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check UNI2.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs CAP.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, CAP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while CAP.DE trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAP.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to CAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check CAP.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs APD.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, APD.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while APD.DE trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TOM.HM has daily volatility of 1.08 and APD.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check APD.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 4GLD.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, 4GLD.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while 4GLD.DE trades at €141.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4GLD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4GLD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 4GLD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 4GLD.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs GIB.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, GIB.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while GIB.DE trades at €37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIB.DE's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIB.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is more volatile compared to GIB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check GIB.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs XMWK.DE Comparison March 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 241.7B. In comparison, XMWK.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €18.55, while XMWK.DE trades at €15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMWK.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XMWK.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to XMWK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check XMWK.DE's competition here