Tempus Resources Limited
Tempus Resources Limited (TMR.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMR.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMR.AX | A$0.00 | -20.00% | 4.1M | -0.20 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| RIO.AX | A$159.14 | +3.86% | 261.1B | 18.35 | A$8.76 | +3.64% |
| BHP.AX | A$49.87 | -1.00% | 256.1B | 17.27 | A$2.92 | +3.88% |
| FMG.AX | A$20.28 | +0.45% | 63.3B | 11.74 | A$1.75 | +5.94% |
| LYC.AX | A$18.68 | -6.97% | 19.8B | 246.50 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| S32.AX | A$4.25 | +5.33% | 19.8B | 33.92 | A$0.13 | +2.14% |
| PLS.AX | A$5.10 | -0.97% | 17B | -175.67 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$53.25 | -6.08% | 10.9B | 27.56 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$1.00 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 7.65 | A$0.13 | +5.76% |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMR.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 261.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RIO.AX trades at A$159.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 256.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BHP.AX trades at A$49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FMG.AX trades at A$20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LYC.AX trades at A$18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LYC.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs S32.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while S32.AX trades at A$4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PLS.AX trades at A$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -175.67. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MIN.AX trades at A$53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and ATM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IGO.AX trades at A$7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -29.96. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AII.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AII.AX trades at A$20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -26.46. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LTR.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ILU.AX trades at A$6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DRR.AX trades at A$3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ELV.AX trades at A$8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DVP.AX trades at A$4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IPX.AX trades at A$3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 993.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -88.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 817.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 779.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and JAV.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAV.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 777.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 697.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 680.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 654.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 593.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 590.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BNZ.AX trades at A$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -46.37. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -22.42. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 521M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 506.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and MAUCA.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 478M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 427.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 423.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs INR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 384.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while INR.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 318M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 303.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and TGN.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 286.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ASM.AX trades at A$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -12.91. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 241M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and FEX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FEX.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LOT.AX trades at A$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 237M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs A11.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A11.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ETM.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ETM.AX has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ETM.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ETM.AX's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ETM.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ETM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ETM.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs VMS.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VMS.AX has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VMS.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VMS.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VMS.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and VMS.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMS.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 150.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and KGL.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGL.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs CII.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX and CII.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CII.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
TMR.AX vs STA.AX Comparison April 2026
TMR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMR.AX stands at 4.1M. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMR.AX is priced at A$0.00, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, TMR.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMR.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMR.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here