Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYC.AX | A$15.49 | -4.68% | 16B | 204.19 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$57.54 | -2.71% | 292.3B | 17.87 | A$3.22 | +3.40% |
| RIO.AX | A$158.60 | -3.81% | 261.4B | 16.34 | A$9.85 | +3.66% |
| FMG.AX | A$18.76 | -0.61% | 58.1B | 10.27 | A$1.84 | +6.47% |
| S32.AX | A$4.02 | -0.62% | 17.5B | 16.29 | A$0.24 | +2.42% |
| PLS.AX | A$4.27 | -4.59% | 14B | -143.66 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$55.33 | -5.09% | 11.2B | 28.16 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$0.90 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 28.40 | A$0.03 | +7.41% |
| AII.AX | A$19.35 | -3.87% | 5.3B | -25.40 | -A$0.73 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 292.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while BHP.AX trades at A$57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 261.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RIO.AX trades at A$158.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while FMG.AX trades at A$18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while S32.AX trades at A$4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PLS.AX trades at A$4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -143.66. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MIN.AX trades at A$55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ATM.AX trades at A$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AII.AX trades at A$19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while IGO.AX trades at A$6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -23.82. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LTR.AX trades at A$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ILU.AX trades at A$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while DVP.AX trades at A$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -1464.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 808.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -64.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 805.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 780M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -82.05. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while BNZ.AX trades at A$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 638M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -87.03. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while A1G.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 581M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -42.24. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -41.04. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 511.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 504.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -28.72. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 450.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 415.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while INR.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -47.87. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 334.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 320.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is -295.24. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 298.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CXU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CXU.AX has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CXU.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CXU.AX's P/E ratio is 357.14. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXU.AX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CXU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CXU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 239.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SLS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SLS.AX has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SLS.AX trades at A$2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SLS.AX's P/E ratio is 183.64. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SLS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while A11.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -21.49. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ASM.AX trades at A$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ALR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ALR.AX has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ALR.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ALR.AX's P/E ratio is -37.04. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ALR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ALR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs 3DA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, 3DA.AX has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while 3DA.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas 3DA.AX's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3DA.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to 3DA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check 3DA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 160.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is -22.61. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ZEO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RMI.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RMI.AX has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RMI.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RMI.AX's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RMI.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -5.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CII.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs STA.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TLG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ESS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -49.49. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs WR1.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, WR1.AX has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while WR1.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas WR1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WR1.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to WR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check WR1.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CBE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, CBE.AX has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while CBE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas CBE.AX's P/E ratio is -36.96. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CBE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CBE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GL1.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, GL1.AX has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while GL1.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas GL1.AX's P/E ratio is 23500.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GL1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to GL1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GL1.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while LOT.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FHE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.37. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DEV.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, DEV.AX has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while DEV.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas DEV.AX's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEV.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to DEV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DEV.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MSV.AX Comparison July 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 16B. In comparison, MSV.AX has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$15.49, while MSV.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 204.19, whereas MSV.AX's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSV.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MSV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MSV.AX's competition here