Lynas Rare Earths Limited
Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYC.AX | A$19.68 | +5.18% | 19.8B | 246.00 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$54.95 | -0.87% | 279.2B | 19.49 | A$2.82 | +3.53% |
| RIO.AX | A$170.80 | -0.77% | 277.4B | 20.12 | A$8.49 | +3.42% |
| FMG.AX | A$20.22 | +0.55% | 62.2B | 11.89 | A$1.70 | +6.07% |
| PLS.AX | A$5.98 | -2.13% | 19.3B | -199.33 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| S32.AX | A$4.26 | -1.16% | 19.1B | 35.50 | A$0.12 | +2.19% |
| MIN.AX | A$61.88 | +0.83% | 12.2B | 30.63 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| AII.AX | A$28.72 | -2.48% | 8.1B | -35.90 | -A$0.80 | N/A |
| LTR.AX | A$2.43 | +2.53% | 7.7B | -17.36 | -A$0.14 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$0.96 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 8.00 | A$0.12 | +7.47% |
Stock Comparison
LYC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 279.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while BHP.AX trades at A$54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 277.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while RIO.AX trades at A$170.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while FMG.AX trades at A$20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PLS.AX trades at A$5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -199.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while S32.AX trades at A$4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MIN.AX trades at A$61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AII.AX trades at A$28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LTR.AX trades at A$2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -17.36. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ATM.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while IGO.AX trades at A$7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while NIC.AX trades at A$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ILU.AX trades at A$8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ELV.AX trades at A$13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while DVP.AX trades at A$5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while IPX.AX trades at A$4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while FFM.AX trades at A$2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -213.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -86.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 951.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 951M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 936.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 857.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to JAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check JAV.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 774.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 748.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -53.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 637.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 603.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 599.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while BNZ.AX trades at A$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -20.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while A1G.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 577.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -48.87. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 532.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 530.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 522M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 502.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 475.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while INR.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MMI.AX trades at A$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ASM.AX trades at A$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 305.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LOT.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ALR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ALR.AX has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ALR.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ALR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ALR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ALR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while A11.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 252.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 241M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LKE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, LKE.AX has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while LKE.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas LKE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LKE.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LKE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VMS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, VMS.AX has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while VMS.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas VMS.AX's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VMS.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to VMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VMS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SLS.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, SLS.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while SLS.AX trades at A$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas SLS.AX's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to SLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SLS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GL1.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, GL1.AX has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while GL1.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas GL1.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GL1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to GL1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GL1.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FHE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CII.AX Comparison April 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 19.8B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.68, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 246.00, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here