Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 341.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while BHP.AX trades at A$66.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 289.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while RIO.AX trades at A$174.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while FMG.AX trades at A$17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while S32.AX trades at A$5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PLS.AX trades at A$5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LYC.AX trades at A$15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 76.65. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LYC.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MIN.AX trades at A$64.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AII.AX trades at A$25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is 106.92. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LTR.AX trades at A$1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ILU.AX trades at A$6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while DVP.AX trades at A$5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -173.66. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while BNZ.AX trades at A$3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -53.51. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 916.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while G6M.AX trades at A$3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -8.95%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check G6M.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 883.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -34.60. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 869.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 787.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 778.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 655.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while A1G.AX trades at A$1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -42.24. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -41.04. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CBE.AX has a market cap of 483.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CBE.AX trades at A$0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CBE.AX's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CBE.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CBE.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 456M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MMI.AX trades at A$1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 422.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -34.44. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -30.36. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, SLS.AX has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while SLS.AX trades at A$2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas SLS.AX's P/E ratio is 178.42. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to SLS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check SLS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ALR.AX has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ALR.AX trades at A$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ALR.AX's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ALR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ALR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while INR.AX trades at A$0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -39.01. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is -290.48. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, BML.AX has a market cap of 296.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while BML.AX trades at A$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas BML.AX's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BML.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to BML.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check BML.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while A11.AX trades at A$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, LFT.AX has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while LFT.AX trades at A$2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas LFT.AX's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFT.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to LFT.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check LFT.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CXU.AX has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CXU.AX trades at A$0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CXU.AX's P/E ratio is 314.29. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXU.AX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CXU.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CXU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 220.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -29.01. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CY5.AX has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CY5.AX trades at A$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CY5.AX's P/E ratio is -32.69. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CY5.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CY5.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CY5.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, GL1.AX has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while GL1.AX trades at A$0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas GL1.AX's P/E ratio is 34000.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to GL1.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check GL1.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, GBR.AX has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while GBR.AX trades at A$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas GBR.AX's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBR.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to GBR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check GBR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ZEO.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, 3DA.AX has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while 3DA.AX trades at A$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas 3DA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3DA.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to 3DA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check 3DA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check TLG.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, DEV.AX has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while DEV.AX trades at A$0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas DEV.AX's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEV.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to DEV.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check DEV.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -5.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ACS.AX has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ACS.AX trades at A$0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ACS.AX's P/E ratio is -32.47. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACS.AX's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ACS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ACS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ESS.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, WR1.AX has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while WR1.AX trades at A$0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas WR1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WR1.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to WR1.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check WR1.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -37.74. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MEU.AX has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MEU.AX trades at A$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MEU.AX's P/E ratio is -85.09. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEU.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MEU.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MEU.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, KRR.AX has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while KRR.AX trades at A$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas KRR.AX's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRR.AX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to KRR.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check KRR.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -41.77. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, MSV.AX has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while MSV.AX trades at A$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas MSV.AX's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSV.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to MSV.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check MSV.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ETM.AX has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ETM.AX trades at A$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ETM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETM.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ETM.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ETM.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ZER.AX has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ZER.AX trades at A$0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ZER.AX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZER.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is more volatile compared to ZER.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ZER.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CUF.AX has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CUF.AX trades at A$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CUF.AX's P/E ratio is 185.71. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUF.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CUF.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CUF.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, PAN.AX has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while PAN.AX trades at A$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas PAN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to PAN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check PAN.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, ARL.AX has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while ARL.AX trades at A$0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas ARL.AX's P/E ratio is -60.80. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARL.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to ARL.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check ARL.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here

Jupiter Mines Limited (ASX: JMS.AX) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JMS.AX stands at 521M. In comparison, OCN.AX has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, JMS.AX is priced at A$0.26 on the ASX, while OCN.AX trades at A$0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 17.32, whereas OCN.AX's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, JMS.AX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCN.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMS.AX is less volatile compared to OCN.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMS.AX.Check OCN.AX's competition here