Nickel Industries Limited (NIC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NIC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC.AX | A$0.95 | -0.52% | 4.1B | -46.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$59.50 | -1.39% | 304.4B | 20.88 | A$2.87 | +3.27% |
| RIO.AX | A$173.92 | -1.18% | 285.9B | 20.28 | A$8.68 | +3.35% |
| FMG.AX | A$19.25 | -1.79% | 59.3B | 11.14 | A$1.73 | +6.33% |
| LYC.AX | A$19.34 | +3.87% | 18.7B | 232.38 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| S32.AX | A$4.06 | -2.17% | 18.6B | 34.50 | A$0.12 | +2.28% |
| PLS.AX | A$5.66 | +2.35% | 17.6B | -182.33 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$65.86 | -1.16% | 12.8B | 32.15 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| AII.AX | A$25.91 | -3.75% | 7.5B | -38.75 | -A$0.68 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$0.96 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 6.82 | A$0.14 | +6.98% |
Stock Comparison
NIC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BHP.AX trades at A$59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while RIO.AX trades at A$173.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while FMG.AX trades at A$19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LYC.AX trades at A$19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 232.38. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LYC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while S32.AX trades at A$4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PLS.AX trades at A$5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -182.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MIN.AX trades at A$65.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AII.AX trades at A$25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ATM.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LTR.AX trades at A$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while IGO.AX trades at A$7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -27.85. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ILU.AX trades at A$7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while DVP.AX trades at A$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PRN.AX trades at A$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while IPX.AX trades at A$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -19.05. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -172.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 982.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 908.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 746.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 690M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 642.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 623.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to JAV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check JAV.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 613.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BNZ.AX trades at A$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 607.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while A1G.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 560.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -46.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 525M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -43.12. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.46. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 481M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while INR.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 452.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 421.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 317.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 272M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 266.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ASM.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while A11.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 200.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 199.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CXU.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CXU.AX has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CXU.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CXU.AX's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CXU.AX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CXU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CXU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SLS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SLS.AX has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SLS.AX trades at A$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SLS.AX's P/E ratio is -55.17. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SLS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ALR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALR.AX has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ALR.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ALR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ALR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ALR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CBE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBE.AX has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CBE.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CBE.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CBE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CBE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CBE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ZEO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CII.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BCK.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCK.AX has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while BCK.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas BCK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCK.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BCK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BCK.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs STA.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FHE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ESS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ELT.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ELT.AX has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while ELT.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas ELT.AX's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ELT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ELT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs WR1.AX Comparison June 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WR1.AX has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.95, while WR1.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -46.75, whereas WR1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WR1.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to WR1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check WR1.AX's competition here