Nickel Industries Limited
Nickel Industries Limited (NIC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NIC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC.AX | A$1.01 | +1.21% | 4.4B | -50.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$55.51 | -1.05% | 285.3B | 19.99 | A$2.81 | +3.49% |
| RIO.AX | A$170.20 | -0.81% | 280.8B | 20.37 | A$8.49 | +3.41% |
| FMG.AX | A$20.00 | +1.11% | 60.9B | 11.63 | A$1.70 | +6.17% |
| S32.AX | A$4.34 | +0.35% | 19.7B | 36.58 | A$0.12 | +2.15% |
| PLS.AX | A$6.07 | +5.11% | 19.1B | -197.67 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| LYC.AX | A$18.72 | +2.72% | 18.2B | 226.00 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$60.47 | +1.85% | 11.6B | 29.21 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| AII.AX | A$29.60 | -4.05% | 8.5B | -37.75 | -A$0.80 | N/A |
| LTR.AX | A$2.36 | +5.13% | 7.2B | -16.29 | -A$0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NIC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 285.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while BHP.AX trades at A$55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 280.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while RIO.AX trades at A$170.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while FMG.AX trades at A$20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while S32.AX trades at A$4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PLS.AX trades at A$6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -197.67. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LYC.AX trades at A$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 226.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LYC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MIN.AX trades at A$60.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AII.AX trades at A$29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -37.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LTR.AX trades at A$2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ATM.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while IGO.AX trades at A$7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -27.11. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ILU.AX trades at A$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ELV.AX trades at A$13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while DVP.AX trades at A$5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while IPX.AX trades at A$4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -19.41. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while FFM.AX trades at A$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -219.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 994.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -22.83. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 994.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 982.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 901M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 786.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 779.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to JAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check JAV.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -19.69. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 605.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -25.92. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while BNZ.AX trades at A$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while A1G.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 579.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 550.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 543.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while INR.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MMI.AX trades at A$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 362.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 359.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ALR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALR.AX has a market cap of 328.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ALR.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ALR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ALR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ALR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ASM.AX trades at A$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 288M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LOT.AX trades at A$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 283.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while A11.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs LKE.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LKE.AX has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while LKE.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas LKE.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LKE.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check LKE.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs SLS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLS.AX has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while SLS.AX trades at A$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas SLS.AX's P/E ratio is -51.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check SLS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs VMS.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VMS.AX has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while VMS.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas VMS.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VMS.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check VMS.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ELT.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ELT.AX has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ELT.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ELT.AX's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ELT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ELT.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ETM.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ETM.AX has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ETM.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ETM.AX's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ETM.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ETM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ETM.AX's competition here
NIC.AX vs ARL.AX Comparison April 2026
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARL.AX has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$1.01, while ARL.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -50.75, whereas ARL.AX's P/E ratio is -68.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARL.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ARL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.Check ARL.AX's competition here