Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Motor Corporation TM Peers
See (TM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TM | $170.54 | +0.20% | 222.5B | 6.93 | $24.59 | +3.17% |
| TSLA | $295.88 | -0.65% | 952.1B | 165.37 | $1.79 | N/A |
| RACE | $491.01 | +0.40% | 87.5B | 47.24 | $10.39 | +1.22% |
| GM | $52.57 | +0.73% | 50.5B | 7.34 | $7.16 | +1.20% |
| F-PC | $21.59 | +1.31% | 47.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.34% |
| F | $11.83 | +1.24% | 46.2B | 9.46 | $1.25 | +6.34% |
| F-PB | $22.07 | +2.08% | 44.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.34% |
| F-PD | $23.55 | +1.64% | 43.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.34% |
| STLA | $10.28 | +1.68% | 29.4B | 4.74 | $2.17 | +23.60% |
| XPEV | $17.65 | -1.56% | 16B | -23.52 | -$0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TM vs TSLA Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 952.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while TSLA trades at $295.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 165.37. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs RACE Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while RACE trades at $491.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs GM Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while GM trades at $52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs F-PC Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while F-PC trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs F Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while F trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs F-PB Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while F-PB trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs F-PD Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while F-PD trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs STLA Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while STLA trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs XPEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while XPEV trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.52. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs RIVN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while RIVN trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs HMC Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while HMC trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LI Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LI trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs VFS Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while VFS trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs NIO Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while NIO trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LCID Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LCID trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ZK Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ZK trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs PSNY Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while PSNY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LOT Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LOT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs BLBD Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while BLBD trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LVWR Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 779.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LVWR trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs NAKD Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs VFSWW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs PSNYW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while PSNYW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs NIU Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while NIU trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FLYE Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 230.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FLYE trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -72.17. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FFAI Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FFAI trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FFIEW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FFIE Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LOTWW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs CJET Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while CJET trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FSR Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs CENN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while CENN trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs WKHS Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while WKHS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs SOLO Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs RIDE Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs SVMH Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ECDAW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ECDAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs GP Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while GP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ECDA Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ECDA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs PEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ARVL Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs AIEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while AIEV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs GOEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs EVTV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while EVTV trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs HYZN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs LOBO Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while LOBO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs VLCN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while VLCN trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs DMN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs AYRO Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while AYRO trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs FFAIW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs VEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ZAPP Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs GOEVW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs EGOX Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs MULN Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 335.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while MULN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs SEV Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ADOM Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs TTM Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs SOLOW Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs ELMS Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.
TM vs PTRA Comparison
TM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TM stands at 222.5B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TM is priced at $170.54, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TM is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TM.