Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. TGS Peers
See (TGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGS | $31.36 | +3.70% | 4.75B | 14.45 | $2.17 | N/A |
| XOM | $108.64 | +0.15% | 468.20B | 14.41 | $7.54 | +3.62% |
| CVX | $142.30 | +0.44% | 248.51B | 16.24 | $8.76 | +4.65% |
| SHEL | $66.10 | -0.15% | 200.84B | 13.06 | $5.06 | +4.13% |
| TTE | $59.21 | -0.15% | 131.48B | 9.92 | $5.97 | +5.73% |
| BP | $30.13 | -0.76% | 78.73B | -73.49 | -$0.41 | +6.19% |
| PBR-A | $11.23 | -1.14% | 75.48B | 8.38 | $1.34 | +17.76% |
| EQNR | $23.57 | +0.86% | 64.45B | 7.46 | $3.16 | +8.48% |
| E | $30.07 | -0.23% | 45.93B | 17.58 | $1.71 | +7.59% |
| SU | $36.00 | -0.94% | 44.54B | 10.37 | $3.47 | +4.45% |
Stock Comparison
TGS vs XOM Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 468.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while XOM trades at $108.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs CVX Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 248.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while CVX trades at $142.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs SHEL Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 200.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while SHEL trades at $66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs TTE Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 131.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while TTE trades at $59.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs BP Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 78.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while BP trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -73.49. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs PBR-A Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 75.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while PBR-A trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs EQNR Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while EQNR trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs E Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 45.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while E trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs SU Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 44.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while SU trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs PBR Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 37.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while PBR trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs IMO Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while IMO trades at $72.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs CVE Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while CVE trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs EC Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while EC trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs YPF Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 14.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while YPF trades at $35.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs NFG Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while NFG trades at $81.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 176.13. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs TANNZ Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs SLNG Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while SLNG trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs CGBS Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 42.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while CGBS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs SKYQ Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while SKYQ trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.
TGS vs ZEST Comparison
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.75B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $31.36, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.45, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.