Tricon Residential Inc.
Tricon Residential Inc. (TCN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCN | $11.25 | +0.18% | 3.1B | 27.44 | $0.41 | +1.55% |
| CBRE | $149.19 | +0.00% | 43.8B | 38.19 | $3.85 | N/A |
| CSGP | $49.07 | +0.00% | 21.1B | 831.17 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BEKE | $17.12 | -0.02% | 19.7B | 40.17 | $0.43 | +2.08% |
| JLL | $313.69 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 24.05 | $13.05 | N/A |
| FSV | $156.06 | +0.00% | 7.1B | 49.13 | $3.17 | +0.71% |
| BPYPP | $16.37 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 7.44 | $2.20 | +10.46% |
| BPYPO | $15.30 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 6.98 | $2.20 | +10.46% |
| CIGI | $115.02 | +0.00% | 5.7B | 56.50 | $2.02 | +0.26% |
| BPYPN | $13.98 | -0.01% | 5.6B | 6.39 | $2.20 | +10.46% |
Stock Comparison
TCN vs CBRE Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CBRE trades at $149.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CBRE's competition here
TCN vs CSGP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CSGP trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 831.17. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CSGP's competition here
TCN vs BEKE Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while BEKE trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check BEKE's competition here
TCN vs JLL Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while JLL trades at $313.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check JLL's competition here
TCN vs FSV Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while FSV trades at $156.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 49.13. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check FSV's competition here
TCN vs BPYPP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while BPYPP trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check BPYPP's competition here
TCN vs BPYPO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while BPYPO trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check BPYPO's competition here
TCN vs CIGI Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CIGI trades at $115.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CIGI's competition here
TCN vs BPYPN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while BPYPN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check BPYPN's competition here
TCN vs OPEN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while OPEN trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check OPEN's competition here
TCN vs CWK Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CWK trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CWK's competition here
TCN vs NMRK Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while NMRK trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check NMRK's competition here
TCN vs HOUS Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check HOUS's competition here
TCN vs HBNB Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while HBNB trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -115.50. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check HBNB's competition here
TCN vs KW Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while KW trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check KW's competition here
TCN vs RDFN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check RDFN's competition here
TCN vs RLGY Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check RLGY's competition here
TCN vs EXPI Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while EXPI trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -68.27. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check EXPI's competition here
TCN vs PGRU Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check PGRU's competition here
TCN vs MMI Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while MMI trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -515.60. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check MMI's competition here
TCN vs INDT Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check INDT's competition here
TCN vs QK Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check QK's competition here
TCN vs REAX Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 557M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while REAX trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -52.60. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check REAX's competition here
TCN vs RMR Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 525.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while RMR trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check RMR's competition here
TCN vs FRPH Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while FRPH trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 96.76. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check FRPH's competition here
TCN vs TCI Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while TCI trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 72.57. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check TCI's competition here
TCN vs MLP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while MLP trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -29.66. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check MLP's competition here
TCN vs SEG Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while SEG trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check SEG's competition here
TCN vs FLJ Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check FLJ's competition here
TCN vs CIAN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CIAN's competition here
TCN vs OPAD-WT Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
TCN vs NEN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 229.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while NEN trades at $65.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check NEN's competition here
TCN vs DOUG Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while DOUG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check DOUG's competition here
TCN vs RMAX Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while RMAX trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check RMAX's competition here
TCN vs STHO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while STHO trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check STHO's competition here
TCN vs LODE Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LODE trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LODE's competition here
TCN vs MAYS Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while MAYS trades at $51.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -208.68. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check MAYS's competition here
TCN vs DOMA Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check DOMA's competition here
TCN vs ASPS Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while ASPS trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASPS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check ASPS's competition here
TCN vs RFL Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while RFL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check RFL's competition here
TCN vs WE Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check WE's competition here
TCN vs CHG Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHG's ROE of +9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CHG's competition here
TCN vs XHG Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while XHG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check XHG's competition here
TCN vs OMH Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while OMH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check OMH's competition here
TCN vs FTHM Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while FTHM trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check FTHM's competition here
TCN vs OPAD Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while OPAD trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check OPAD's competition here
TCN vs WETH Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while WETH trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check WETH's competition here
TCN vs LHAI Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LHAI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LHAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LHAI's competition here
TCN vs GYRO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while GYRO trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 46.08. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check GYRO's competition here
TCN vs LGPS Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LGPS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LGPS's competition here
TCN vs LEJU Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LEJU's competition here
TCN vs AIRE Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while AIRE trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -13.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check AIRE's competition here
TCN vs DUO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while DUO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check DUO's competition here
TCN vs AVCO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVCO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check AVCO's competition here
TCN vs GBR Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while GBR trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -27.01. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check GBR's competition here
TCN vs MDJH Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check MDJH's competition here
TCN vs SFRWW Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check SFRWW's competition here
TCN vs SFR Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check SFR's competition here
TCN vs ALBT Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while ALBT trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALBT's ROE of +9.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check ALBT's competition here
TCN vs UK Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 999.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while UK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check UK's competition here
TCN vs LRHC Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 593.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LRHC trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LRHC's competition here
TCN vs UOKA Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 277.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while UOKA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check UOKA's competition here
TCN vs UKOMW Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check UKOMW's competition here
TCN vs LMRKO Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LMRKO's competition here
TCN vs BPY Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check BPY's competition here
TCN vs LMRKN Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LMRKN's competition here
TCN vs NTP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check NTP's competition here
TCN vs CTC Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check CTC's competition here
TCN vs LMRK Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LMRK's competition here
TCN vs OBAS Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check OBAS's competition here
TCN vs IRCP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check IRCP's competition here
TCN vs LMRKP Comparison February 2026
TCN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN is priced at $11.25, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TCN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN is less volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.Check LMRKP's competition here