FirstService Corporation
FirstService Corporation (FSV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | $129.70 | -0.16% | 6B | 36.54 | $3.55 | +0.87% |
| CBRE | $129.95 | -1.89% | 38.1B | 29.67 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BEKE | $18.17 | -3.66% | 21.1B | 47.82 | $0.38 | +1.52% |
| JLL | $288.23 | -0.24% | 13.4B | 15.52 | $18.58 | N/A |
| CSGP | $32.68 | +2.61% | 13.3B | 466.86 | $0.07 | N/A |
| BPYPP | $15.83 | -0.13% | 6.5B | 7.21 | $2.20 | +10.40% |
| BPYPO | $15.35 | +0.33% | 6.3B | 6.97 | $2.20 | +10.40% |
| BPYPN | $13.92 | -0.36% | 5.7B | 6.34 | $2.20 | +10.40% |
| CIGI | $92.00 | -1.84% | 4.6B | 56.44 | $1.63 | +0.32% |
| OPEN | $4.38 | -2.01% | 3.4B | -2.49 | -$1.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSV vs CBRE Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CBRE trades at $129.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CBRE's competition here
FSV vs BEKE Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while BEKE trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 47.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BEKE's competition here
FSV vs JLL Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while JLL trades at $288.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check JLL's competition here
FSV vs CSGP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CSGP trades at $32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 466.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CSGP's competition here
FSV vs BPYPP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while BPYPP trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPP's competition here
FSV vs BPYPO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while BPYPO trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPO's competition here
FSV vs BPYPN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while BPYPN trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPN's competition here
FSV vs CIGI Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CIGI trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIGI's competition here
FSV vs OPEN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while OPEN trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPEN's competition here
FSV vs TCN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCN's competition here
FSV vs CWK Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CWK trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CWK's competition here
FSV vs VTMX Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, VTMX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while VTMX trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas VTMX's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to VTMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check VTMX's competition here
FSV vs NMRK Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while NMRK trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NMRK's competition here
FSV vs HOUS Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HOUS's competition here
FSV vs KW Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while KW trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas KW's P/E ratio is 91.88. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check KW's competition here
FSV vs RDFN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RDFN's competition here
FSV vs HBNB Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while HBNB trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -46.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HBNB's competition here
FSV vs RLGY Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RLGY's competition here
FSV vs PGRU Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check PGRU's competition here
FSV vs MMI Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while MMI trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -1411.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MMI's competition here
FSV vs EXPI Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 750.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while EXPI trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check EXPI's competition here
FSV vs INDT Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check INDT's competition here
FSV vs QK Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check QK's competition here
FSV vs RMR Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while RMR trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMR's competition here
FSV vs FRPH Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while FRPH trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 438.80. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FRPH's competition here
FSV vs REAX Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while REAX trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -42.75. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check REAX's competition here
FSV vs TCI Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while TCI trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCI's competition here
FSV vs MLP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while MLP trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -27.74. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MLP's competition here
FSV vs SEG Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while SEG trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SEG's competition here
FSV vs FLJ Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FLJ's competition here
FSV vs CIAN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIAN's competition here
FSV vs OPAD-WT Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
FSV vs NEN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while NEN trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is -122.92. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEN's ROE of +53.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NEN's competition here
FSV vs RMAX Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while RMAX trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMAX's competition here
FSV vs DOUG Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while DOUG trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOUG's competition here
FSV vs LODE Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LODE trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LODE's competition here
FSV vs STHO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while STHO trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check STHO's competition here
FSV vs DOMA Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA's competition here
FSV vs MAYS Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while MAYS trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -104.07. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MAYS's competition here
FSV vs ASPS Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while ASPS trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ASPS's competition here
FSV vs XHG Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while XHG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check XHG's competition here
FSV vs RFL Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while RFL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RFL's competition here
FSV vs WE Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE's competition here
FSV vs CHG Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHG's ROE of +9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CHG's competition here
FSV vs FTHM Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while FTHM trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FTHM's competition here
FSV vs OMH Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while OMH trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OMH's competition here
FSV vs OPAD Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while OPAD trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD's competition here
FSV vs WETH Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while WETH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WETH's competition here
FSV vs GYRO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while GYRO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 46.81. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GYRO's competition here
FSV vs LGPS Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LGPS trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LGPS's competition here
FSV vs LHAI Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LHAI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is -47.14. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHAI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LHAI's competition here
FSV vs LEJU Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LEJU's competition here
FSV vs AIRE Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while AIRE trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AIRE's competition here
FSV vs DUO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while DUO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DUO's competition here
FSV vs AVCO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -8.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AVCO's competition here
FSV vs GBR Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while GBR trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -77.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GBR's competition here
FSV vs MDJH Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MDJH's competition here
FSV vs SFR Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFR's competition here
FSV vs SFRWW Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFRWW's competition here
FSV vs ALBT Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while ALBT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -8.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ALBT's competition here
FSV vs UK Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 626.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while UK trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UK's competition here
FSV vs UOKA Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while UOKA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UOKA's competition here
FSV vs LRHC Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 436K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LRHC trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LRHC's competition here
FSV vs UKOMW Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UKOMW's competition here
FSV vs IRCP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check IRCP's competition here
FSV vs LMRK Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRK's competition here
FSV vs NTP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NTP's competition here
FSV vs LMRKP Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKP's competition here
FSV vs OBAS Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OBAS's competition here
FSV vs WE-WT Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE-WT's competition here
FSV vs LMRKO Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKO's competition here
FSV vs BPY Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPY's competition here
FSV vs DOMA-WT Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA-WT's competition here
FSV vs CTC Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CTC's competition here
FSV vs LMRKN Comparison May 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $129.70, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKN's competition here