FirstService Corporation (FSV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | $137.83 | -0.12% | 6.3B | 38.83 | $3.55 | +0.82% |
| CBRE | $131.55 | +0.58% | 38.5B | 18.42 | $7.14 | N/A |
| BEKE | $14.91 | -3.93% | 16.6B | 33.89 | $0.44 | +1.85% |
| JLL | $297.29 | -0.34% | 13.8B | 15.99 | $18.59 | N/A |
| CSGP | $30.12 | -1.12% | 12.3B | 430.29 | $0.07 | N/A |
| BPYPP | $15.62 | -0.51% | 6.6B | 7.11 | $2.20 | +10.41% |
| BPYPO | $15.31 | -0.33% | 6.4B | 6.97 | $2.20 | +10.41% |
| BPYPN | $13.78 | -0.79% | 5.8B | 6.28 | $2.20 | +10.41% |
| CIGI | $91.31 | -1.70% | 4.5B | 56.02 | $1.63 | +0.33% |
| OPEN | $4.47 | +0.45% | 3.4B | -2.54 | -$1.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSV vs CBRE Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CBRE trades at $131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CBRE's competition here
FSV vs BEKE Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while BEKE trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BEKE's competition here
FSV vs JLL Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while JLL trades at $297.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check JLL's competition here
FSV vs CSGP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CSGP trades at $30.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 430.29. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CSGP's competition here
FSV vs BPYPP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while BPYPP trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPP's competition here
FSV vs BPYPO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while BPYPO trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPO's competition here
FSV vs BPYPN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while BPYPN trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPN's competition here
FSV vs CIGI Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CIGI trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 56.02. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIGI's competition here
FSV vs OPEN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while OPEN trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPEN's competition here
FSV vs TCN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCN's competition here
FSV vs CWK Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CWK trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CWK's competition here
FSV vs VTMX Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VTMX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while VTMX trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas VTMX's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to VTMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check VTMX's competition here
FSV vs NMRK Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while NMRK trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NMRK's competition here
FSV vs HOUS Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HOUS's competition here
FSV vs KW Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while KW trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas KW's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check KW's competition here
FSV vs RDFN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RDFN's competition here
FSV vs RLGY Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RLGY's competition here
FSV vs HBNB Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while HBNB trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -41.38. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HBNB's competition here
FSV vs MMI Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while MMI trades at $29.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -1466.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MMI's competition here
FSV vs PGRU Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check PGRU's competition here
FSV vs EXPI Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 753.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while EXPI trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -33.79. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check EXPI's competition here
FSV vs INDT Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check INDT's competition here
FSV vs RMR Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 651.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while RMR trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMR's competition here
FSV vs QK Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check QK's competition here
FSV vs FRPH Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while FRPH trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 474.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FRPH's competition here
FSV vs REAX Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 377.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while REAX trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check REAX's competition here
FSV vs MLP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 366.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while MLP trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -92.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MLP's competition here
FSV vs TCI Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while TCI trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCI's competition here
FSV vs SEG Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while SEG trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SEG's competition here
FSV vs FLJ Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FLJ's competition here
FSV vs CIAN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIAN's competition here
FSV vs OPAD-WT Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
FSV vs NEN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while NEN trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is -123.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NEN's competition here
FSV vs RMAX Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while RMAX trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 489.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMAX's competition here
FSV vs LODE Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 176.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LODE trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LODE's competition here
FSV vs DOUG Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 156.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while DOUG trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOUG's competition here
FSV vs STHO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while STHO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check STHO's competition here
FSV vs RFL Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while RFL trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RFL's competition here
FSV vs MAYS Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while MAYS trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -76.90. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MAYS's competition here
FSV vs DOMA Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA's competition here
FSV vs ASPS Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while ASPS trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ASPS's competition here
FSV vs XHG Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while XHG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check XHG's competition here
FSV vs WE Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE's competition here
FSV vs CHG Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHG's ROE of +39.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CHG's competition here
FSV vs FTHM Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while FTHM trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FTHM's competition here
FSV vs LGPS Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LGPS trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LGPS's competition here
FSV vs OPAD Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while OPAD trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD's competition here
FSV vs OMH Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while OMH trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OMH's competition here
FSV vs LEJU Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LEJU's competition here
FSV vs GYRO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while GYRO trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GYRO's competition here
FSV vs LHAI Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LHAI trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHAI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LHAI's competition here
FSV vs AIRE Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while AIRE trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AIRE's competition here
FSV vs DUO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while DUO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DUO's competition here
FSV vs AVCO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -8.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AVCO's competition here
FSV vs GBR Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while GBR trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -75.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GBR's competition here
FSV vs MDJH Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MDJH's competition here
FSV vs SFR Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFR's competition here
FSV vs SFRWW Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFRWW's competition here
FSV vs ALBT Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while ALBT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -8.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ALBT's competition here
FSV vs UOKA Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while UOKA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UOKA's competition here
FSV vs UK Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 426.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while UK trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UK's competition here
FSV vs LRHC Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 326.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LRHC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LRHC's competition here
FSV vs UKOMW Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UKOMW's competition here
FSV vs LMRKN Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKN's competition here
FSV vs BPY Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPY's competition here
FSV vs LMRK Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRK's competition here
FSV vs IRCP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check IRCP's competition here
FSV vs NTP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NTP's competition here
FSV vs LMRKO Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKO's competition here
FSV vs LMRKP Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKP's competition here
FSV vs OBAS Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OBAS's competition here
FSV vs DOMA-WT Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA-WT's competition here
FSV vs WE-WT Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE-WT's competition here
FSV vs CTC Comparison June 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $137.83, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 38.83, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CTC's competition here