FLJ Group Limited (QK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QK | $2.74 | -3.52% | 636.8M | -0.31 | -$8.72 | N/A |
| CBRE | $141.58 | +2.37% | 41.5B | 19.83 | $7.14 | N/A |
| BEKE | $15.09 | +0.27% | 16.1B | 23.24 | $0.65 | +1.83% |
| JLL | $327.46 | +2.86% | 15.2B | 16.42 | $19.94 | N/A |
| CSGP | $30.00 | +2.18% | 12.3B | 31.91 | $0.94 | N/A |
| FSV | $145.74 | +1.87% | 6.7B | 25.17 | $5.79 | +0.80% |
| BPYPP | $15.19 | -2.38% | 6.4B | -15.63 | -$0.98 | +10.61% |
| BPYPN | $13.45 | +0.07% | 6.3B | -17.88 | -$0.76 | +10.61% |
| BPYPO | $15.01 | +0.60% | 6.3B | 185.08 | $0.08 | +10.61% |
| CIGI | $98.51 | +2.25% | 4.9B | 16.04 | $6.14 | +0.31% |
Stock Comparison
QK vs CBRE Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CBRE trades at $141.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CBRE's competition here
QK vs BEKE Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BEKE trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BEKE's competition here
QK vs JLL Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while JLL trades at $327.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check JLL's competition here
QK vs CSGP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CSGP trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CSGP's competition here
QK vs FSV Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FSV trades at $145.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FSV's competition here
QK vs BPYPP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPP trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPP's competition here
QK vs BPYPN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPN trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPN's competition here
QK vs BPYPO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPO trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 185.08. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPO's competition here
QK vs CIGI Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CIGI trades at $98.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CIGI's competition here
QK vs OPEN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPEN trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPEN's competition here
QK vs CWK Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CWK trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CWK's competition here
QK vs TCN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check TCN's competition here
QK vs VTMX Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, VTMX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while VTMX trades at $34.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VTMX's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to VTMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check VTMX's competition here
QK vs NMRK Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NMRK trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NMRK's competition here
QK vs HOUS Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check HOUS's competition here
QK vs RDFN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +8.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RDFN's competition here
QK vs RLGY Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RLGY's competition here
QK vs MMI Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MMI trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is 454.71. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MMI's competition here
QK vs PGRU Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check PGRU's competition here
QK vs EXPI Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 753.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while EXPI trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -33.79. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check EXPI's competition here
QK vs INDT Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check INDT's competition here
QK vs RMR Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 653.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RMR trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RMR's competition here
QK vs FRPH Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 485.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FRPH trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 421.83. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FRPH's competition here
QK vs REAX Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while REAX trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -67.73. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check REAX's competition here
QK vs TCI Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while TCI trades at $48.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is -4912.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check TCI's competition here
QK vs MLP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MLP trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -69.60. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MLP's competition here
QK vs FLJ Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FLJ's competition here
QK vs CIAN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CIAN's competition here
QK vs OPAD-WT Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
QK vs RMAX Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RMAX trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RMAX's competition here
QK vs NEN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NEN trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NEN's competition here
QK vs DOUG Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOUG trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOUG's competition here
QK vs LODE Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LODE trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LODE's competition here
QK vs RFL Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RFL trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RFL's competition here
QK vs STHO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while STHO trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check STHO's competition here
QK vs DOMA Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOMA's competition here
QK vs MAYS Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MAYS trades at $39.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -68.95. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MAYS's competition here
QK vs BEEP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BEEP has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BEEP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BEEP's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEEP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BEEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BEEP's competition here
QK vs WE Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check WE's competition here
QK vs CHG Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHG's ROE of +39.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CHG's competition here
QK vs FTHM Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FTHM trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FTHM's competition here
QK vs LHAI Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LHAI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is -158.18. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHAI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LHAI's competition here
QK vs LGPS Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LGPS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LGPS's competition here
QK vs OPAD Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPAD trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPAD's competition here
QK vs LEJU Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LEJU's competition here
QK vs GYRO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while GYRO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check GYRO's competition here
QK vs OMH Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OMH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OMH's competition here
QK vs DUO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DUO trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DUO's competition here
QK vs AVCO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -8.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check AVCO's competition here
QK vs GBR Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while GBR trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check GBR's competition here
QK vs MDJH Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MDJH's competition here
QK vs SFRWW Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check SFRWW's competition here
QK vs SFR Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check SFR's competition here
QK vs ALBT Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while ALBT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -8.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check ALBT's competition here
QK vs UOKA Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UOKA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UOKA's competition here
QK vs UK Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 414.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UK trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UK's competition here
QK vs LRHC Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 305.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LRHC trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LRHC's competition here
QK vs UKOMW Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UKOMW's competition here
QK vs LMRKP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKP's competition here
QK vs LMRKN Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKN's competition here
QK vs WE-WT Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check WE-WT's competition here
QK vs LMRKO Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKO's competition here
QK vs BPY Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPY's competition here
QK vs IRCP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check IRCP's competition here
QK vs LMRK Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRK's competition here
QK vs NTP Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NTP's competition here
QK vs OBAS Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OBAS's competition here
QK vs DOMA-WT Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOMA-WT's competition here
QK vs CTC Comparison July 2026
QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CTC's competition here