FLJ Group Limited

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CBRE trades at $148.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CBRE's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BEKE trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BEKE's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while JLL trades at $338.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check JLL's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CSGP trades at $36.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 1822.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CSGP's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FSV trades at $146.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FSV's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPP trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPP's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPO trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPYPN trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPYPN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CIGI trades at $108.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CIGI's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPEN trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPEN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CWK trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CWK's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while TCN trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check TCN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NMRK trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NMRK's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while HOUS trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check HOUS's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while HBNB trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -96.29. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check HBNB's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while KW trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check KW's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RDFN trades at $11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RDFN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RLGY trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RLGY's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while PGRU trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check PGRU's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MMI trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -565.32. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MMI's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while EXPI trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -46.07. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check EXPI's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while INDT trades at $66.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check INDT's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while REAX trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check REAX's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 540.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RMR trades at $16.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RMR's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 413.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FRPH trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 119.94. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FRPH's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 317.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while TCI trades at $36.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check TCI's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MLP trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MLP's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 290.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while SEG trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check SEG's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FLJ trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FLJ's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CIAN trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CIAN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPAD-WT's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NEN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NEN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOUG trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOUG's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RMAX trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RMAX's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LODE trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LODE's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while STHO trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check STHO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOMA trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOMA's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MAYS trades at $40.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -96.19. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MAYS's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while ASPS trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check ASPS's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while XHG trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check XHG's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while RFL trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check RFL's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while WE trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check WE's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CHG trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CHG's ROE of +9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CHG's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while FTHM trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check FTHM's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OPAD trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OPAD's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while WETH trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check WETH's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OMH trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OMH's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LGPS trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LGPS's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while GYRO trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 49.81. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check GYRO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LHAI trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LHAI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LHAI's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LEJU trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LEJU's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while AIRE trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check AIRE's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DUO trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DUO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while AVCO trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AVCO's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check AVCO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while GBR trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -80.78. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check GBR's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while MDJH trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check MDJH's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check SFRWW's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while SFR trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check SFR's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while ALBT trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALBT's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check ALBT's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 631.7K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LRHC trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LRHC's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UOKA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UOKA's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 530.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UK trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UK's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check UKOMW's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while NTP trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check NTP's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKN's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRK trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRK's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while BPY trades at $18.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check BPY's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKO's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while IRCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check IRCP's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check DOMA-WT's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while OBAS trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check OBAS's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check WE-WT's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while CTC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check CTC's competition here

QK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QK stands at 636.8M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QK is priced at $2.74, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, QK's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QK is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QK.Check LMRKP's competition here