Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. TCI Peers
See (TCI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCI | $40.79 | +6.86% | 352.4M | 44.82 | $0.91 | N/A |
DUO | $2.59 | +7.02% | 71.5B | 0.34 | $7.67 | N/A |
CBRE | $134.03 | +0.80% | 40B | 40.74 | $3.29 | N/A |
CSGP | $81.94 | +0.96% | 34.6B | 292.64 | $0.28 | N/A |
JLL | $240.70 | +1.57% | 11.4B | 21.74 | $11.07 | N/A |
FSV | $178.03 | +0.73% | 8.1B | 60.76 | $2.93 | +0.58% |
BEKE | $19.19 | +3.90% | 7.3B | 36.21 | $0.53 | +1.88% |
CIGI | $128.02 | +0.51% | 6.3B | 44.45 | $2.88 | +0.23% |
BPYPP | $14.60 | +0.14% | 5.4B | 6.65 | $2.20 | +10.89% |
BPYPO | $14.58 | +1.18% | 5.4B | 6.64 | $2.20 | +10.89% |
Stock Comparison
TCI vs DUO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while DUO trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CBRE Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CBRE trades at $134.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CSGP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CSGP trades at $81.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 292.64. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs JLL Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while JLL trades at $240.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs FSV Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while FSV trades at $178.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs BEKE Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while BEKE trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CIGI Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CIGI trades at $128.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs BPYPP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while BPYPP trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs BPYPO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while BPYPO trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs BPYPN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while BPYPN trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs TCN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CWK Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CWK trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs NMRK Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while NMRK trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs EXPI Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while EXPI trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -100.67. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs RDFN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while RDFN trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs RLGY Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs MMI Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while MMI trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -181.88. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs PGRU Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs KW Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 905.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while KW trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs REAX Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 826.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while REAX trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -57.29. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs INDT Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs QK Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs FRPH Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 514.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while FRPH trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 74.86. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs RMR Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 512.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while RMR trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs HOUS Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 449.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while HOUS trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs OPEN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while OPEN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs MLP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while MLP trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -22.91. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs RMAX Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while RMAX trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs NEN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while NEN trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs FLJ Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs SEG Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while SEG trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs DOUG Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while DOUG trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CIAN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs OPAD-WT Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LODE Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LODE trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs ASPS Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while ASPS trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs STHO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while STHO trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs RFL Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while RFL trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs DOMA Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs MAYS Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while MAYS trades at $38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -297.69. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs WE Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs CHG Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs FTHM Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while FTHM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs OPAD Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while OPAD trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LGPS Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LGPS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs AIRE Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while AIRE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs GYRO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while GYRO trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LEJU Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs WETH Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while WETH trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs OMH Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while OMH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LRHC Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LRHC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LRHC's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs GBR Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while GBR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs ALBT Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while ALBT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs AVCO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs UOKA Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while UOKA trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs MDJH Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs UKOMW Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs UK Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while UK trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs SFR Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs SFRWW Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs XHG Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while XHG trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XHG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LMRKN Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs BPY Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LMRKO Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs NTP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs OBAS Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LMRKP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs IRCP Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.
TCI vs LMRK Comparison
TCI plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCI stands at 352.4M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCI is priced at $40.79, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCI currently has a P/E ratio of 44.82, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCI's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCI is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCI.