TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030
TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030 (TANNZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TANNZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANNZ | $25.26 | +0.00% | 999.2M | 35.23 | $0.72 | N/A |
| XOM | $111.28 | +1.88% | 474.5B | 15.79 | $7.05 | +3.56% |
| CVX | $158.18 | +1.69% | 323.8B | 20.33 | $7.78 | +4.26% |
| SHEL | $73.32 | +1.14% | 216.8B | 16.37 | $4.48 | +3.86% |
| TTE | $64.03 | +0.91% | 144.5B | 11.60 | $5.52 | +5.50% |
| BP | $34.74 | +2.03% | 90.1B | 138.96 | $0.25 | +5.55% |
| PBR | $12.33 | +3.18% | 79.4B | 5.76 | $2.14 | +14.41% |
| PBR-A | $11.42 | +3.16% | 77.1B | 5.33 | $2.14 | +16.36% |
| EQNR | $25.17 | +0.80% | 66B | 8.33 | $3.02 | +8.50% |
| E | $35.93 | +1.35% | 55.6B | 20.88 | $1.72 | +6.61% |
Stock Comparison
TANNZ vs XOM Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 474.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while XOM trades at $111.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check XOM's competition here
TANNZ vs CVX Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 323.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVX trades at $158.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVX's competition here
TANNZ vs SHEL Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 216.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SHEL trades at $73.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SHEL's competition here
TANNZ vs TTE Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TTE trades at $64.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TTE's competition here
TANNZ vs BP Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while BP trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 138.96. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check BP's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR-A Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR-A trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR-A's competition here
TANNZ vs EQNR Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EQNR trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EQNR's competition here
TANNZ vs E Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, E has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while E trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas E's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check E's competition here
TANNZ vs SU Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SU trades at $39.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SU's competition here
TANNZ vs IMO Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while IMO trades at $87.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check IMO's competition here
TANNZ vs CVE Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVE trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVE's competition here
TANNZ vs EC Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EC trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EC's competition here
TANNZ vs YPF Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while YPF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check YPF's competition here
TANNZ vs NFG Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while NFG trades at $87.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check NFG's competition here
TANNZ vs TGS Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TGS trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TGS's competition here
TANNZ vs SLNG Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SLNG trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 82.00. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SLNG's competition here
TANNZ vs CGBS Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CGBS's competition here
TANNZ vs SKYQ Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SKYQ trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SKYQ's competition here
TANNZ vs ZEST Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check ZEST's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-A Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-A's competition here
TANNZ vs PTR Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PTR's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-B Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-B's competition here
TANNZ vs SNP Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SNP's competition here
TANNZ vs TELZ Comparison August 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TELZ's competition here