TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030
TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030 (TANNZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TANNZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANNZ | $25.26 | +0.00% | 999.2M | 35.23 | $0.72 | N/A |
| XOM | $111.44 | +0.94% | 480.4B | 14.78 | $7.54 | +3.53% |
| CVX | $156.28 | +0.93% | 320B | 17.86 | $8.75 | +4.31% |
| SHEL | $72.21 | +0.31% | 212.2B | 16.49 | $4.38 | +3.89% |
| TTE | $60.96 | +0.48% | 134.3B | 11.05 | $5.52 | +5.35% |
| BP | $32.67 | +1.48% | 84.8B | -79.62 | -$0.41 | +5.90% |
| PBR | $12.55 | -0.40% | 78.1B | 9.35 | $1.34 | +14.12% |
| PBR-A | $11.46 | -0.61% | 76.7B | 8.55 | $1.34 | +16.50% |
| EQNR | $26.08 | +2.84% | 66.2B | 8.63 | $3.02 | +9.28% |
| E | $34.30 | -1.12% | 51.8B | 18.94 | $1.81 | +6.59% |
Stock Comparison
TANNZ vs XOM Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 480.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while XOM trades at $111.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check XOM's competition here
TANNZ vs CVX Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 320B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVX trades at $156.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVX's competition here
TANNZ vs SHEL Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 212.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SHEL trades at $72.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SHEL's competition here
TANNZ vs TTE Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TTE trades at $60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TTE's competition here
TANNZ vs BP Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while BP trades at $32.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -79.62. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check BP's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR-A Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR-A trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR-A's competition here
TANNZ vs EQNR Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EQNR trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EQNR's competition here
TANNZ vs E Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, E has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while E trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas E's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check E's competition here
TANNZ vs SU Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SU trades at $39.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SU's competition here
TANNZ vs IMO Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while IMO trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check IMO's competition here
TANNZ vs CVE Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVE trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVE's competition here
TANNZ vs EC Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EC trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EC's competition here
TANNZ vs YPF Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while YPF trades at $33.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check YPF's competition here
TANNZ vs NFG Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while NFG trades at $85.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 186.98. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check NFG's competition here
TANNZ vs TGS Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TGS trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TGS's competition here
TANNZ vs SLNG Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SLNG trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SLNG's competition here
TANNZ vs CGBS Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CGBS's competition here
TANNZ vs SKYQ Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SKYQ trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SKYQ's competition here
TANNZ vs ZEST Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check ZEST's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-B Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-B's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-A Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-A's competition here
TANNZ vs TELZ Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TELZ's competition here
TANNZ vs PTR Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PTR's competition here
TANNZ vs SNP Comparison July 2025
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +208.19%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SNP's competition here