Smurfit Westrock Plc
Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SW | $39.42 | -0.83% | 20.7B | 29.65 | $1.33 | +4.36% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| IP | $37.54 | +0.78% | 19.9B | -6.69 | -$5.61 | +4.97% |
| PKG | $214.95 | +0.21% | 19.3B | 25.06 | $8.58 | +2.33% |
| AMCR | $40.60 | +0.07% | 18.8B | 30.53 | $1.33 | +6.32% |
| BALL | $62.10 | -0.14% | 16.6B | 18.82 | $3.30 | +1.29% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $106.14 | +0.92% | 12.2B | 16.64 | $6.38 | +0.99% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
| SEE | $41.84 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 13.99 | $2.99 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
SW vs BLL Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BLL's competition here
SW vs IP Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while IP trades at $37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check IP's competition here
SW vs PKG Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while PKG trades at $214.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PKG's competition here
SW vs AMCR Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while AMCR trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check AMCR's competition here
SW vs BALL Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while BALL trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BALL's competition here
SW vs WRK Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check WRK's competition here
SW vs CCK Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while CCK trades at $106.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check CCK's competition here
SW vs BERY Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BERY's competition here
SW vs SEE Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while SEE trades at $41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SEE's competition here
SW vs SON Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while SON trades at $53.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SON's competition here
SW vs REYN Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while REYN trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check REYN's competition here
SW vs SLGN Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while SLGN trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SLGN's competition here
SW vs GEF-B Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while GEF-B trades at $81.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GEF-B's competition here
SW vs PTVE Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PTVE's competition here
SW vs GEF Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while GEF trades at $66.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GEF's competition here
SW vs GPK Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while GPK trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GPK's competition here
SW vs AMBP Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while AMBP trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check AMBP's competition here
SW vs OI Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while OI trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.48. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check OI's competition here
SW vs TRS Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while TRS trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TRS's competition here
SW vs MYE Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 778.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while MYE trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check MYE's competition here
SW vs FFHL Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check FFHL's competition here
SW vs KRT Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 559.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while KRT trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check KRT's competition here
SW vs PACK Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 292.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while PACK trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PACK's competition here
SW vs OCTO Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check OCTO's competition here
SW vs TUP Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TUP's competition here
SW vs MGIH Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while MGIH trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check MGIH's competition here
SW vs YHGJ Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while YHGJ trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check YHGJ's competition here
SW vs DSS Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while DSS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check DSS's competition here
SW vs TYDE Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TYDE's competition here
SW vs ARD Comparison March 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 20.7B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $39.42, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 29.65, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check ARD's competition here