Summit Materials, Inc.
Summit Materials, Inc. (SUM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| CRH | $99.82 | +0.09% | 66.8B | 18.11 | $5.51 | +1.51% |
| MLM | $583.75 | -0.62% | 35.2B | 35.79 | $16.31 | +0.56% |
| VMC | $265.42 | +0.61% | 35.1B | 32.54 | $8.16 | +0.75% |
| AMRZ | $55.55 | -1.33% | 30.7B | 25.96 | $2.14 | N/A |
| CX | $10.41 | +0.29% | 15.1B | 38.54 | $0.27 | +0.86% |
| JHX | $19.64 | -0.10% | 11.4B | 81.79 | $0.24 | N/A |
| EXP | $186.47 | +0.02% | 6B | 14.09 | $13.23 | +0.54% |
| KNF | $78.47 | +0.28% | 4.4B | 28.41 | $2.76 | N/A |
| USLM | $119.23 | +2.27% | 3.4B | 25.59 | $4.66 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
SUM vs CRH Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while CRH trades at $99.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check CRH's competition here
SUM vs MLM Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while MLM trades at $583.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check MLM's competition here
SUM vs VMC Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while VMC trades at $265.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check VMC's competition here
SUM vs AMRZ Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while AMRZ trades at $55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check AMRZ's competition here
SUM vs CX Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while CX trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check CX's competition here
SUM vs JHX Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while JHX trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 81.79. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check JHX's competition here
SUM vs EXP Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while EXP trades at $186.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check EXP's competition here
SUM vs KNF Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while KNF trades at $78.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check KNF's competition here
SUM vs USLM Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while USLM trades at $119.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check USLM's competition here
SUM vs TTAM Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while TTAM trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check TTAM's competition here
SUM vs BCC Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while BCC trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check BCC's competition here
SUM vs TGLS Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while TGLS trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check TGLS's competition here
SUM vs LOMA Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while LOMA trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 167.00. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check LOMA's competition here
SUM vs CPAC Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 858.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while CPAC trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check CPAC's competition here
SUM vs SMID Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while SMID trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check SMID's competition here
SUM vs FEAM Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while FEAM trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check FEAM's competition here
SUM vs CAPS Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while CAPS trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check CAPS's competition here
SUM vs RETO Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 326.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while RETO trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check RETO's competition here
SUM vs USCR Comparison March 2026
SUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUM stands at 9.2B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUM is priced at $52.49, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUM currently has a P/E ratio of 61.75, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, SUM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUM is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUM.Check USCR's competition here