Suncor Energy Inc.
Suncor Energy Inc. SU Peers
See (SU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU | $38.29 | -1.76% | 47B | 10.85 | $3.53 | +4.14% |
| XOM | $108.37 | -3.02% | 467B | 14.39 | $7.53 | +3.50% |
| CVX | $143.61 | -2.22% | 250.8B | 16.41 | $8.75 | +4.55% |
| SHEL | $70.14 | -0.99% | 207.6B | 16.01 | $4.38 | +3.95% |
| TTE | $60.54 | -1.21% | 135.1B | 10.14 | $5.97 | +5.28% |
| BP | $29.84 | -1.58% | 77.6B | -72.78 | -$0.41 | +6.24% |
| PBR | $12.41 | -2.36% | 76.9B | 9.26 | $1.34 | +15.51% |
| PBR-A | $11.33 | -2.33% | 73.6B | 8.46 | $1.34 | +16.40% |
| EQNR | $25.15 | -5.06% | 68.8B | 7.96 | $3.16 | +8.90% |
| E | $31.98 | -0.96% | 48.7B | 17.97 | $1.78 | +7.04% |
Stock Comparison
SU vs XOM Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 467B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while XOM trades at $108.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CVX Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 250.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while CVX trades at $143.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SHEL Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while SHEL trades at $70.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TTE Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while TTE trades at $60.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs BP Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while BP trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -72.78. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PBR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while PBR trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PBR-A Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while PBR-A trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs EQNR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while EQNR trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs E Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while E trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs IMO Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while IMO trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CVE Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while CVE trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs EC Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while EC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs YPF Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while YPF trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs NFG Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while NFG trades at $85.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 185.80. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TGS Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while TGS trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TANNZ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SLNG Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while SLNG trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CGBS Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while CGBS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SKYQ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while SKYQ trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs ZEST Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TELZ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs RDS-B Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs RDS-A Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PTR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SNP Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 47B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $38.29, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.