Suncor Energy Inc.
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU | $56.80 | +0.00% | 67.4B | 15.66 | $3.56 | +2.98% |
| XOM | $150.97 | +0.00% | 621.3B | 21.96 | $6.71 | +2.74% |
| CVX | $184.78 | +0.00% | 367.6B | 27.69 | $6.64 | +3.77% |
| SHEL | $80.38 | +0.93% | 229B | 13.30 | $6.00 | +3.63% |
| TTE | $77.83 | +0.00% | 173.4B | 13.47 | $5.78 | +4.93% |
| PBR | $15.76 | +0.00% | 101.9B | 7.32 | $2.16 | +6.96% |
| BP | $39.01 | +1.30% | 100.1B | 1909.25 | $0.02 | +5.15% |
| PBR-A | $14.54 | +0.00% | 94.7B | 6.80 | $2.16 | +7.67% |
| EQNR | $28.85 | +0.00% | 73B | 14.85 | $1.94 | +4.48% |
| E | $43.85 | +0.00% | 66.5B | 22.65 | $1.95 | +4.65% |
Stock Comparison
SU vs XOM Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 621.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while XOM trades at $150.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check XOM's competition here
SU vs CVX Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 367.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while CVX trades at $184.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CVX's competition here
SU vs SHEL Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 229B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while SHEL trades at $80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SHEL's competition here
SU vs TTE Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while TTE trades at $77.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TTE's competition here
SU vs PBR Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while PBR trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check PBR's competition here
SU vs BP Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while BP trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 1909.25. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check BP's competition here
SU vs PBR-A Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while PBR-A trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check PBR-A's competition here
SU vs EQNR Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while EQNR trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check EQNR's competition here
SU vs E Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while E trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas E's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check E's competition here
SU vs IMO Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while IMO trades at $122.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check IMO's competition here
SU vs CVE Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while CVE trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CVE's competition here
SU vs EC Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while EC trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check EC's competition here
SU vs YPF Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while YPF trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -32.65. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check YPF's competition here
SU vs NFG Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while NFG trades at $87.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check NFG's competition here
SU vs TGS Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while TGS trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TGS's competition here
SU vs TANNZ Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TANNZ's competition here
SU vs SLNG Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while SLNG trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SLNG's competition here
SU vs CGBS Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CGBS's competition here
SU vs SKYQ Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while SKYQ trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SKYQ's competition here
SU vs ZEST Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check ZEST's competition here
SU vs CGBSW Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CGBSW's competition here
SU vs SNP Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SNP's competition here
SU vs TELZ Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TELZ's competition here
SU vs RDS-B Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check RDS-B's competition here
SU vs RDS-A Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check RDS-A's competition here
SU vs PTR Comparison February 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 67.4B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $56.80, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check PTR's competition here