Suncor Energy Inc.
Suncor Energy Inc. SU Peers
See (SU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU | $36.91 | +0.71% | 45.3B | 10.58 | $3.49 | +4.30% |
| XOM | $103.83 | +0.76% | 447.5B | 13.77 | $7.54 | +3.77% |
| CVX | $139.51 | +1.21% | 243.6B | 15.94 | $8.75 | +4.77% |
| SHEL | $67.83 | +0.56% | 202.2B | 15.49 | $4.38 | +4.13% |
| TTE | $60.08 | -0.71% | 133.4B | 10.06 | $5.97 | +5.63% |
| BP | $29.56 | -0.08% | 76.8B | -72.09 | -$0.41 | +6.42% |
| PBR-A | $10.97 | +0.09% | 72.2B | 8.19 | $1.34 | +18.18% |
| EQNR | $24.27 | -0.21% | 66.4B | 7.68 | $3.16 | +9.69% |
| E | $30.23 | -0.49% | 46.1B | 17.47 | $1.73 | +7.54% |
| IMO | $73.54 | +1.31% | 37.4B | 10.93 | $6.73 | +2.55% |
Stock Comparison
SU vs XOM Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 447.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while XOM trades at $103.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CVX Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 243.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while CVX trades at $139.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SHEL Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 202.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while SHEL trades at $67.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TTE Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while TTE trades at $60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs BP Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while BP trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -72.09. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PBR-A Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while PBR-A trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs EQNR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while EQNR trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs E Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while E trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs IMO Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while IMO trades at $73.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PBR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while PBR trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CVE Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while CVE trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs EC Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while EC trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs YPF Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while YPF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs NFG Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while NFG trades at $83.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 181.93. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TGS Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while TGS trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TANNZ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SLNG Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while SLNG trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 68.25. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs CGBS Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while CGBS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SKYQ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while SKYQ trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs ZEST Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs RDS-A Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs RDS-B Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs SNP Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs PTR Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.
SU vs TELZ Comparison
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 45.3B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $36.91, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.