Spire Inc.
Spire Inc. SR-PA Peers
See (SR-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR-PA | $23.88 | +0.55% | 4.4B | 5.90 | $4.04 | +4.23% |
| ATO | $151.51 | -1.39% | 24.1B | 21.17 | $7.16 | +2.24% |
| NI | $39.41 | -1.62% | 18.6B | 21.30 | $1.85 | +2.76% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.76% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.76% |
| UGI | $35.20 | +0.34% | 7.6B | 14.49 | $2.43 | +4.26% |
| SWX | $73.75 | -1.95% | 5.3B | 23.63 | $3.12 | +3.34% |
| BIPC | $42.45 | +0.88% | 5.1B | -20.71 | -$2.05 | +3.93% |
| UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.26% |
| NJR | $45.05 | -0.42% | 4.5B | 10.94 | $4.12 | +3.99% |
Stock Comparison
SR-PA vs ATO Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while ATO trades at $151.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NI Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NI trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NIMC Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NI-PB Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs UGI Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while UGI trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs SWX Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while SWX trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs BIPC Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while BIPC trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs UGIC Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NJR Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NJR trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs OGS Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while OGS trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs SR Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while SR trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs PCG-PI Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while PCG-PI trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs CPK Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while CPK trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs CTRI Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while CTRI trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 2198.50. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NWN Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NWN trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs SPH Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while SPH trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs NFE Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while NFE trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs OPALW Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs RGCO Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while RGCO trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs OPAL Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while OPAL trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 129.75. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.
SR-PA vs MIC Comparison
SR-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SR-PA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SR-PA is priced at $23.88, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.90, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SR-PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SR-PA is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SR-PA.