OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPALW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OPALW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPALW | $1.46 | -7.59% | 634.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SR-PA | $494.31 | -7.92% | 82.4B | 122.23 | $4.04 | +4.13% |
| PCG-PI | $17.08 | -0.33% | 36.9B | 2.69 | $6.34 | +0.88% |
| ATO | $169.96 | +1.03% | 28.4B | 20.96 | $8.11 | +2.28% |
| NI | $47.21 | +1.27% | 22.6B | 23.48 | $2.01 | +2.45% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.45% |
| UGI | $35.03 | +0.75% | 7.5B | 12.33 | $2.84 | +4.30% |
| SWX | $89.01 | +1.12% | 6.4B | 26.95 | $3.30 | +2.82% |
| NJR | $55.09 | +1.12% | 5.6B | 16.34 | $3.37 | +3.45% |
Stock Comparison
OPALW vs SR-PA Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR-PA trades at $494.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 122.23. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SR-PA's competition here
OPALW vs PCG-PI Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while PCG-PI trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check PCG-PI's competition here
OPALW vs ATO Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while ATO trades at $169.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check ATO's competition here
OPALW vs NI Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI trades at $47.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NI's competition here
OPALW vs NIMC Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NIMC's competition here
OPALW vs NI-PB Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NI-PB's competition here
OPALW vs UGI Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGI trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check UGI's competition here
OPALW vs SWX Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SWX trades at $89.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SWX's competition here
OPALW vs NJR Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NJR trades at $55.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NJR's competition here
OPALW vs OGS Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OGS trades at $77.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check OGS's competition here
OPALW vs UGIC Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check UGIC's competition here
OPALW vs BIPC Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while BIPC trades at $40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check BIPC's competition here
OPALW vs SR Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR trades at $79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SR's competition here
OPALW vs CTRI Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CTRI trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 84.29. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check CTRI's competition here
OPALW vs CPK Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CPK trades at $123.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check CPK's competition here
OPALW vs NWN Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NWN trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NWN's competition here
OPALW vs SPH Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SPH trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SPH's competition here
OPALW vs RGCO Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while RGCO trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check RGCO's competition here
OPALW vs SRJN Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SRJN trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SRJN's competition here
OPALW vs NFE Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NFE trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NFE's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NFE's competition here
OPALW vs OPAL Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OPAL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check OPAL's competition here
OPALW vs ADGE Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check ADGE's competition here
OPALW vs MIC Comparison June 2026
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check MIC's competition here