Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPK | $135.23 | +2.51% | 3.2B | 21.56 | $6.27 | +2.08% |
| PCG-PI | $16.84 | +1.51% | 48.1B | 15.14 | $1.11 | +0.97% |
| ATO | $178.47 | +1.95% | 29.8B | 21.92 | $8.14 | +2.18% |
| NI | $46.57 | +2.64% | 22.3B | 23.52 | $1.98 | +2.50% |
| SR-PA | $108.99 | +1.00% | 18.2B | 26.95 | $4.04 | +3.98% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.50% |
| UGI | $36.83 | +0.93% | 7.9B | 11.84 | $3.11 | +4.08% |
| SWX | $92.86 | +0.69% | 6.7B | 24.05 | $3.86 | +2.69% |
| NJR | $58.88 | +0.82% | 5.9B | 16.39 | $3.59 | +3.23% |
Stock Comparison
CPK vs PCG-PI Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while PCG-PI trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check PCG-PI's competition here
CPK vs ATO Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while ATO trades at $178.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ATO's competition here
CPK vs NI Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while NI trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI's competition here
CPK vs SR-PA Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while SR-PA trades at $108.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR-PA's competition here
CPK vs NIMC Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NIMC's competition here
CPK vs NI-PB Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI-PB's competition here
CPK vs UGI Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while UGI trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGI's competition here
CPK vs SWX Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while SWX trades at $92.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SWX's competition here
CPK vs NJR Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while NJR trades at $58.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NJR's competition here
CPK vs BKH Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BKH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while BKH trades at $74.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas BKH's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to BKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check BKH's competition here
CPK vs BIPC Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while BIPC trades at $40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check BIPC's competition here
CPK vs OGS Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while OGS trades at $80.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OGS's competition here
CPK vs UGIC Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGIC's competition here
CPK vs SR Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while SR trades at $82.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR's competition here
CPK vs MDU Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while MDU trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check MDU's competition here
CPK vs CTRI Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while CTRI trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check CTRI's competition here
CPK vs NWN Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while NWN trades at $51.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NWN's competition here
CPK vs SPH Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while SPH trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SPH's competition here
CPK vs OPALW Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPALW's competition here
CPK vs RGCO Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while RGCO trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check RGCO's competition here
CPK vs SRJN Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while SRJN trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SRJN's competition here
CPK vs OPAL Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while OPAL trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPAL's competition here
CPK vs ADGE Comparison July 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $135.23, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.56, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ADGE's competition here