Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPK | $126.48 | -0.36% | 3B | 21.20 | $5.97 | +2.17% |
| ATO | $187.77 | -0.41% | 31.1B | 24.48 | $7.67 | +1.99% |
| NI | $48.08 | +0.00% | 23B | 24.66 | $1.95 | +2.41% |
| SR-PA | $117.35 | -0.06% | 19.5B | 29.00 | $4.04 | +3.57% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.41% |
| UGI | $34.90 | -1.41% | 7.5B | 12.98 | $2.69 | +4.27% |
| SWX | $93.07 | -0.14% | 6.7B | 28.64 | $3.25 | +2.67% |
| NJR | $56.10 | +0.18% | 5.7B | 17.36 | $3.23 | +3.35% |
| OGS | $88.82 | -0.10% | 5.6B | 20.29 | $4.37 | +3.03% |
Stock Comparison
CPK vs ATO Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while ATO trades at $187.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ATO's competition here
CPK vs NI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NI trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI's competition here
CPK vs SR-PA Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while SR-PA trades at $117.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR-PA's competition here
CPK vs NIMC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NIMC's competition here
CPK vs NI-PB Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI-PB's competition here
CPK vs UGI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while UGI trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGI's competition here
CPK vs SWX Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while SWX trades at $93.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SWX's competition here
CPK vs NJR Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NJR trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NJR's competition here
CPK vs OGS Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while OGS trades at $88.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OGS's competition here
CPK vs SR Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while SR trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR's competition here
CPK vs UGIC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGIC's competition here
CPK vs BIPC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while BIPC trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check BIPC's competition here
CPK vs PCG-PI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while PCG-PI trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check PCG-PI's competition here
CPK vs CTRI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while CTRI trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 157.20. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check CTRI's competition here
CPK vs NWN Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NWN trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NWN's competition here
CPK vs SPH Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while SPH trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SPH's competition here
CPK vs OPALW Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPALW's competition here
CPK vs RGCO Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while RGCO trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check RGCO's competition here
CPK vs NFE Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while NFE trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NFE's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NFE's competition here
CPK vs SRJN Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while SRJN trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SRJN's competition here
CPK vs OPAL Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while OPAL trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPAL's competition here
CPK vs ADGE Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ADGE's competition here
CPK vs MIC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.48, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.20, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check MIC's competition here