Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPK | $126.96 | -0.05% | 3B | 20.34 | $6.22 | +2.17% |
| ATO | $176.62 | -0.47% | 29.7B | 21.87 | $8.13 | +2.10% |
| NI | $47.86 | +0.30% | 22.9B | 23.81 | $2.01 | +2.42% |
| SR-PA | $113.53 | +0.73% | 18.8B | 27.93 | $4.04 | +3.70% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.42% |
| UGI | $36.02 | +0.49% | 7.6B | 12.55 | $2.84 | +4.21% |
| SWX | $90.37 | +1.66% | 6.5B | 27.25 | $3.30 | +2.79% |
| NJR | $57.34 | +0.27% | 5.8B | 16.99 | $3.37 | +3.27% |
| OGS | $82.77 | +0.51% | 5.2B | 18.62 | $4.43 | +3.27% |
Stock Comparison
CPK vs ATO Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while ATO trades at $176.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ATO's competition here
CPK vs NI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NI trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI's competition here
CPK vs SR-PA Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while SR-PA trades at $113.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR-PA's competition here
CPK vs NIMC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NIMC's competition here
CPK vs NI-PB Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NI-PB's competition here
CPK vs UGI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while UGI trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGI's competition here
CPK vs SWX Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while SWX trades at $90.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SWX's competition here
CPK vs NJR Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NJR trades at $57.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NJR's competition here
CPK vs OGS Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while OGS trades at $82.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OGS's competition here
CPK vs SR Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while SR trades at $87.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SR's competition here
CPK vs BIPC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while BIPC trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check BIPC's competition here
CPK vs UGIC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check UGIC's competition here
CPK vs PCG-PI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while PCG-PI trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check PCG-PI's competition here
CPK vs CTRI Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while CTRI trades at $31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 83.89. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check CTRI's competition here
CPK vs NWN Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NWN trades at $50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NWN's competition here
CPK vs SPH Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while SPH trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SPH's competition here
CPK vs OPALW Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPALW's competition here
CPK vs RGCO Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while RGCO trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check RGCO's competition here
CPK vs SRJN Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while SRJN trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check SRJN's competition here
CPK vs NFE Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 181.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while NFE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check NFE's competition here
CPK vs OPAL Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while OPAL trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check OPAL's competition here
CPK vs ADGE Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check ADGE's competition here
CPK vs MIC Comparison May 2026
CPK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPK stands at 3B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPK is priced at $126.96, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.34, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, CPK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CPK is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPK.Check MIC's competition here