Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATO | $177.68 | -0.20% | 29.7B | 21.82 | $8.14 | +2.18% |
| PCG-PI | $16.99 | +2.97% | 38.3B | 15.27 | $1.11 | +1.01% |
| NI | $45.98 | -0.63% | 22B | 23.22 | $1.98 | +2.53% |
| SR-PA | $108.99 | +1.00% | 18.2B | 26.95 | $4.04 | +3.99% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.53% |
| UGI | $36.62 | -0.62% | 7.9B | 11.77 | $3.11 | +4.09% |
| SWX | $92.06 | -0.96% | 6.7B | 23.85 | $3.86 | +2.71% |
| NJR | $58.60 | -1.16% | 5.9B | 16.32 | $3.59 | +3.24% |
| BKH | $74.61 | -1.58% | 5.7B | 18.50 | $4.03 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while PCG-PI trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check PCG-PI's competition here
ATO vs NI Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while NI trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI's competition here
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while SR-PA trades at $108.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR-PA's competition here
ATO vs NIMC Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NIMC's competition here
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI-PB's competition here
ATO vs UGI Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while UGI trades at $36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGI's competition here
ATO vs SWX Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while SWX trades at $92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SWX's competition here
ATO vs NJR Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while NJR trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NJR's competition here
ATO vs BKH Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BKH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while BKH trades at $74.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas BKH's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to BKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BKH's competition here
ATO vs OGS Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while OGS trades at $79.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OGS's competition here
ATO vs BIPC Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while BIPC trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BIPC's competition here
ATO vs UGIC Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGIC's competition here
ATO vs SR Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while SR trades at $81.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR's competition here
ATO vs MDU Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while MDU trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check MDU's competition here
ATO vs CPK Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while CPK trades at $133.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CPK's competition here
ATO vs CTRI Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while CTRI trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CTRI's competition here
ATO vs NWN Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while NWN trades at $51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NWN's competition here
ATO vs SPH Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while SPH trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SPH's competition here
ATO vs OPALW Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPALW's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPALW's competition here
ATO vs RGCO Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while RGCO trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check RGCO's competition here
ATO vs SRJN Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while SRJN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SRJN's competition here
ATO vs OPAL Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while OPAL trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPAL's competition here
ATO vs ADGE Comparison July 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $177.68, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.82, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check ADGE's competition here