Atmos Energy Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATO | $188.54 | -0.76% | 31.2B | 24.59 | $7.67 | +1.99% |
| NI | $48.08 | -0.40% | 23B | 24.66 | $1.95 | +2.41% |
| SR-PA | $117.42 | -0.84% | 19.6B | 29.07 | $4.04 | +3.56% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.41% |
| UGI | $35.40 | -1.91% | 7.6B | 13.16 | $2.69 | +4.21% |
| SWX | $93.20 | -0.90% | 6.7B | 28.68 | $3.25 | +2.66% |
| NJR | $56.00 | -0.55% | 5.6B | 17.33 | $3.23 | +3.33% |
| OGS | $88.91 | -0.35% | 5.6B | 20.35 | $4.37 | +3.02% |
| SR | $90.41 | -0.84% | 5.3B | 19.79 | $4.57 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs NI Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NI trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI's competition here
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while SR-PA trades at $117.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR-PA's competition here
ATO vs NIMC Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NIMC's competition here
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI-PB's competition here
ATO vs UGI Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while UGI trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGI's competition here
ATO vs SWX Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while SWX trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SWX's competition here
ATO vs NJR Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NJR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NJR's competition here
ATO vs OGS Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while OGS trades at $88.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OGS's competition here
ATO vs SR Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while SR trades at $90.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR's competition here
ATO vs UGIC Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGIC's competition here
ATO vs BIPC Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while BIPC trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BIPC's competition here
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while PCG-PI trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check PCG-PI's competition here
ATO vs CTRI Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while CTRI trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 156.92. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CTRI's competition here
ATO vs CPK Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while CPK trades at $126.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CPK's competition here
ATO vs NWN Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NWN trades at $52.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NWN's competition here
ATO vs SPH Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while SPH trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SPH's competition here
ATO vs OPALW Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPALW's competition here
ATO vs RGCO Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while RGCO trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check RGCO's competition here
ATO vs NFE Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 209.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while NFE trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NFE's competition here
ATO vs SRJN Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while SRJN trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SRJN's competition here
ATO vs OPAL Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while OPAL trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPAL's competition here
ATO vs MIC Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check MIC's competition here
ATO vs ADGE Comparison May 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.54, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.59, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check ADGE's competition here